PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3804820

Heating deep seated eccentrically located tumors with an annular phased array system: a comparative clinical study using two annular array operating configurations.

Abstract

Regional heating administered with an annular array to 12 patients with deep-seated advanced malignant disease eccentrically located in the lower abdomen and pelvis is compared based on the annular array operating configuration. One configuration (4 quadrants active) delivers radiofrequency power with relative uniformity throughout the patient cross-section. The other (2 quadrants active) allows the radiofrequency power deposition to be shifted preferentially into the eccentrically located treatment volume. Phantom measurements have been made to demonstrate the redistribution of radiofrequency power that results when the annular array is operated in these respective configurations. Systemic responses (i.e. oral temperature rise, changes in blood pressure, and heart rate) to these regional hyperthermia applications are compared and are not significantly different with respect to these heating configurations. Temperature data obtained during treatment sessions using these two annular array operating configurations are analyzed based on the fraction of measured tumor and normal tissue temperatures exceeding or equal to a given index temperature. Although the two quadrant configuration is more efficient in delivering power to the treatment volume, this analysis does not indicate a significant gain in therapeutic heating as a result of this preferential power deposition. Treatment tolerance and heterogeneity with respect to tissue type and blood flow remained the dominant limiting factors with regard to temperatures achieved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T V Samulski, D S Kapp, P Fessenden, A Lohrbach. 1987. Heating deep seated eccentrically located tumors with an annular phased array system: a comparative clinical study using two annular array operating configurations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(87)90264-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sister Mary Joseph's nodule as presenting sign of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

Umbilical metastases, also named Sister Mary Joseph's nodules, are well documented in the adult population and most often represent an underlying intra-abdominal malignancy, usually a carcinoma of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin. They are indicative of widespread abdominal disease and are associated with a poor prognosis. An extensive review of the literature reveals only two such presentations in the pediatric population. A 14-year-old male presented with an umbilical mass, which was found to be a metastatic lesion of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) of the abdomen. The diagnosis of an intra-abdominal malignancy, most commonly a DSRCT, should be considered in the presence of an umbilical mass in a child.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

Cytology of desmoplastic small round-cell tumor: comparison of pre- and post-chemotherapy fine-needle aspiration biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive malignancy of young adults, which is amenable to fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). As this entity is increasingly recognized and biopsied, cytopathologists are compelled to become familiar with the range of cytologic features of DSRCT. In addition, postchemotherapy tumors may be sampled to confirm disease recurrence before planning additional therapy. This study was designed to compare prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy cytomorphology of DSRCT and to evaluate for distinct chemotherapy-induced changes. METHODS: The authors searched their respective institutional databases for all DSRCT cases with an associated FNAB. FNAB slides, immunocytochemistry, and cytogenetic results were reviewed. RESULTS: Six aspirates from 5 patients were identified, 3 of which were postchemotherapy. The postchemotherapy cases demonstrated cytologic findings not typically described in DSRCTs, including prominent and conspicuous nucleoli, discohesive single-cell architecture, and slightly larger cell size. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomorphologic variability was prominent in prechemotherapy cases, and no case could be classified as DSRCT on cytology alone; immunohistochemistry was necessary for definitive diagnosis. Chemotherapy increased the spectrum of cytologic features. The most notable difference between the 2 groups was a predominantly discohesive single-cell pattern with conspicuous nucleoli in the postchemotherapy group, instead of the clustering pattern of medium-sized cells with inconspicuous nucleoli typically attributed to de novo cases reported in the literature.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗