PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 381253

Hospital case mix and average charge per case: an initial study.

Abstract

The use of case mix to explain hospital costs has been refined in previous research on the cost of hospital-based health care. This study demonstrates the significance of hospital case mix in explaining charges for health care treatment. By assuming that the variables which influence cost should also influence charges, an evaluative function is added to the basic investigative analysis potential of the hospital production process model. The relationship between case mix and charges is found to be weaker than the relationship between case mix and costs. This difference is qualified by methodological variation and possibly explained by cross-subsidization of patient services and lack of adequate controls on charge determination. Further, the relationship between case mix and charges is found to differ between Medicare and Blue Cross patients. This evidence suggests that hospital accounting may not be recovering costs evenly and equitably from clients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L D Goodisman, T Trompeter. 1979. Hospital case mix and average charge per case: an initial study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/381253/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Improving tomorrow's health care with today's tools: a conversation with Larry C. Glasscock. Interview by John K. Iglehart.

The chairman and CEO of WellPoint Inc. provides some factual background on one of the nation's largest health insurers, which covers 34.2 million lives. Its own employees are offered the opportunity to join a consumer-directed health plan, which gives the company some real-life data on which to base its strategies in the marketplace. Glasscock believes that future reform efforts in his company and at the national level must focus on improving quality and affordability, reducing the number of uninsured Americans, and improving the health of those insured by WellPoint and everyone else.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans↗

Brief report: development of a prescription medication information webliography for consumers.

BACKGROUND: Websites offering drug information vary in coverage and quality, and most health care consumers are poorly equipped to assess the quality of internet medication information. OBJECTIVE: To establish a webliography of recommended prescription medication information websites for health care consumers and providers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Drug information websites were systematically identified based on recommendations from health professionals and text-word searches of MEDLINE and Google. The resulting sample of websites was evaluated in a 2-step process. Candidate websites were first screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria representing minimum information requirements. Websites that passed the inclusion/exclusion criteria were then rated on 16 quality criteria using a 5-point scale by 3 trained judges. Website ratings were averaged, then multiplied by the corresponding importance weight of each criterion and summed to generate a total score. Websites with the highest total scores were included in the webliography. RESULTS: Ten websites were selected for inclusion in the webliography. The 3 highest-scoring websites were Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (http://home.anthemhealth.com/topic/drugcenter), U.S. National Library of Medicine (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginformation.html), and Healthvision (http://www.yourhealthinformation.com/library/healthguide/en-us/drugguide/default.htm). CONCLUSION: Medication information websites vary widely in quality and content. The online webliography is a valuable and easily accessed tool that can be recommended by health care professionals to patients who request referral to reliable websites.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans↗