PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3828708

Ureteric stone surgery in practice.

Abstract

From 1983 to 1986 140 patients underwent surgery for ureteric calculus. In approximately 30% "blind" basket extraction was considered appropriate and continued to be effective. Increasing expertise with the rigid ureterorenoscope led to a considerable reduction in open ureterolithotomy (15% in 1985-86), the majority following failed ureteroscopic extraction. In the same year both "blind" basket extraction and ureteroscopy were successful in 82 and 86% of attempts respectively. Electrohydraulic and ultrasonic lithotripsy were used in 12 patients to reduce large impacted calculi. The commonest complication of ureteroscopic stone surgery was perforation; this occurred in 14% of cases, though it was usually trivial and near the vesicoureteric junction. Perforations higher in the ureter tended to follow endoscopic lithotripsy and were often associated with urinary extravasation. Extra-ureteric stone fragments were also occasionally observed in such cases. There were no serious sequelae, although the in-patient stay was prolonged beyond the 48 h customary for uncomplicated extraction. The results suggest that ureteroscopic stone extraction, which can be conveniently introduced into urological practice, should become a standard endoscopic procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Bishop, W T Lawrence, R J Lemberger. 1987. Ureteric stone surgery in practice.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04804.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations