PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3865584

Possible behavioral consequences of light-induced changes in melatonin availability.

Abstract

Melatonin is a hormone secreted at night, in the dark, by the human pineal organ. This nocturnal release of melatonin, in humans and other species, is rapidly suppressed by exposure to sufficiently bright light. In humans, the function, if any, of this circadian pattern of melatonin release has not been determined. In fact, no function has been definitively attributed to the hormone melatonin in humans. In one study, conducted in our laboratory, pharmacologic doses of oral melatonin (240 mg over two hours) were administered to volunteers, and various behavioral parameters were assessed. Melatonin had substantial, but brief, sedative-like effects on mood and performance. Thus it appears that a mechanism exists, whereby light, of sufficient intensity to affect melatonin release in humans, can affect behavior. It can be hypothesized that sufficiently bright light, acting by way of the suppression of melatonin release, can acutely increase alertness or act as a zeitgeber (synchronizer of circadian cycles). The light intensity necessary to suppress melatonin secretion in humans is well above typical indoor lighting conditions, but well below normal outdoor daytime levels of illumination. Therefore, the hypothesis that light may affect behavior or circadian patterns of sleep and waking, if found to be true, could have considerable impact on the design of interior lighting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H R Lieberman, G Garfield, F Waldhauser, H J Lynch, R J Wurtman. 1985. Possible behavioral consequences of light-induced changes in melatonin availability.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb11814.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Redefining response in overactive bladder syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three potential definitions of treatment response in overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, based on the International Continence Society (ICS) definition of OAB, using pooled data from two large clinical trials of the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin succinate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As the ICS definition of OAB does not rely on urodynamic observations for a diagnosis, the use of composite endpoints, such as in the definitions examined here, might provide a more relevant measure of patient benefits. Each definition was tested to assess the impact of pharmacotherapy, comparing treatment response rates based on composite endpoints. Responder definitions were validated based on the impact on quality of life (QoL). Pooled data from two 12-week multinational, multicentre, double-blind randomized studies of solifenacin, a once-daily oral antimuscarinic for treating OAB symptoms, were used for this analysis. Based on the symptom data from these studies (episodes of urgency, incontinence, nocturia and voiding frequency per 24 h), response was defined as being: (i) a reduction by half or more in all baseline symptoms; (ii) a reduction by half or more in urgency and at least one other symptom; or (iii) resolution of urgency episodes and at least one other symptom. Health-related QoL changes were recorded using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ). RESULTS: Solifenacin at 5 mg or 10 mg once daily resulted in significantly higher response rates than with placebo, irrespective of the definition of a responder (P < or = 0.001). When assessing the most challenging definition of response (resolution of urgency and at least one other symptom), solifenacin at 5 mg and 10 mg resulted in 20% and 25% of patients, respectively, meeting the response criteria, vs 12% of placebo-treated patients (P < or = 0.001 for both solifenacin doses). For all three definitions of response, responders showed greater improvements in all KHQ domains than did nonresponders, and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The two strictest definitions of response (halving or more in all baseline symptoms or resolution of urgency and more than one other symptom) appeared to capture QoL changes most effectively. Establishing the most appropriate definition to assess treatment-related changes in OAB will require further investigation, but it is clear from this analysis that composite clinical endpoints, based on the ICS definition of OAB, are a valid approach for assessing the effect of treatments for OAB.

Double-Blind Method↗