PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3875540

[Schizophrenia research using psychiatric case registries].

Abstract

Almost 60 years after the establishment of the National Register of Psychoses in Norway psychiatric case registers have become an indispensable instrument of psychiatric research. By enabling a consecutive, person-related registration of contacts with the health care services of a geographically circumscribed region over long periods they have opened up new perspectives for epidemiological and followup studies and the evaluation of the care provided for schizophrenics. The severity of the illness and the fact that it frequently takes a long-term course are highly likely to lead to contacts with psychiatric services in areas with well-developed service structures. In this way case registers permit relatively reliable estimates of the treatment prevalence and first contacts, providing indicators of the true incidence. In the Federal Republic of Germany, however, as the only country in the world, cumulative psychiatric case registers have become illegal. An examination of long-term ecological, social and individual distribution processes among persons fallen ill with schizophrenia shows that the uneven distribution becomes effective even prior to the first onset. This is reflected in the marriage rates--the more so among males than females--, in the choice of occupation and the social chances of the schizophrenics to-be. In contrast, there is no reliable evidence for an increased risk of falling ill with schizophrenia after exposure to severe stress over a longer period of time. The age at first onset is some 10 years lower for males than females. Neither for this finding nor for the deviating birth season distribution, exhibited by approximately 10% of the schizophrenics, has any conclusive explanation been found. Even after the successful combat against tuberculosis falling ill with schizophrenia clearly reduces further life expectancy. The linkage of data from psychiatric case registers with twin, adoption and birth registers confirms the assumption that the probability of falling ill with schizophrenia is increased by genetic factors, thus refuting the alternative hypothesis of an environment-related transmission of the illness. Case registers are an indispensable means for the evaluation and cost analysis of the care provided for schizophrenics, above all in the establishment of new programmes of community-based complementary care for the chronically ill. Furthermore, they provide a solid basis for methodological studies on questions such as the stability of or transitions in the diagnosis over time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Häfner, W an der Heiden. 1985. [Schizophrenia research using psychiatric case registries].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1001973

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cross-cultural organizational behavior.

This article reviews research on cross-cultural organizational behavior (OB). After a brief review of the history of cross-cultural OB, we review research on work motivation, or the factors that energize, direct, and sustain effort across cultures. We next consider the relationship between the individual and the organization, and review research on culture and organizational commitment, psychological contracts, justice, citizenship behavior, and person-environment fit. Thereafter, we consider how individuals manage their interdependence in organizations, and review research on culture and negotiation and disputing, teams, and leadership, followed by research on managing across borders and expatriation. The review shows that developmentally, cross-cultural research in OB is coming of age. Yet we also highlight critical challenges for future research, including moving beyond values to explain cultural differences, attending to levels of analysis issues, incorporating social and organizational context factors into cross-cultural research, taking indigenous perspectives seriously, and moving beyond intracultural comparisons to understand the dynamics of cross-cultural interfaces.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗

Ethnic minorities and prescription medication; concordance between self-reports and medical records.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic differences in health care utilisation are frequently reported in research. Little is known about the concordance between different methods of data collection among ethnic minorities. The aim of this study was to examine to which extent ethnic differences between self-reported data and data based on electronic medical records (EMR) from general practitioners (GPs) might be a validity issue or reflect a lower compliance among minority groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional, national representative general practice study, using EMR data from 195 GPs. The study population consisted of Dutch, Turks, Surinamese, Antilleans and Morrocans. Self-reported data were collected through face-to-face interviews and could be linked to the EMR of GPs. The main outcome measures were the level of agreement between annual prescribing rate based on the EMRs of GPs and the self-reported receipt and use of prescriptions during the preceding 14 days. RESULTS: The pattern of ethnic differences in receipt and use of prescription medication depended on whether self-reported data or EMR data were used. Ethnic differences based on self-reports were not consistently reflected in EMR data. The percentage of agreement above chance between EMR data and self-reported receipt was in general relative low. CONCLUSION: Ethnic differences between self-reported data and EMR data might not be fully perceived as a cross-cultural validity issue. At least for Moroccans and Turks, compliance with the prescribed medication by the GP is suggested not to be optimal.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗