PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3877430

Acute renal dysfunction after major arteriography.

A S Gomes·J D Baker·V Martin-Paredero·S M Dixon·H Takiff·H I Machleder·W S Moore
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The incidence of acute renal dysfunction (ARD) after major arteriography was evaluated by assessment of the change in serum creatinine in 364 patients undergoing arteriography. Major arteriography was defined as abdominal aortography, abdominal aortography with lower-extremity runoff, aortic arch studies, or aortic arch plus selective carotid angiography. The influence of the volume of contrast material received, hydration, and associated risk factors was evaluated. In the entire group, the frequency of postarteriographic ARD was 7.1%. Although most patients recovered, 1.4% required renal dialysis. The frequency of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in patients with preexisting renal disease (14.8%), and 3.7% of these patients went on to require dialysis. In the total group and in those with normal renal function prearteriographically, the frequency of ARD was found to be related to the volume of iodinated contrast material received. Hydration before, during, and after angiography did not prevent this complication. Several risk factors, namely preexisting renal disease, advanced age, volume of contrast material used, type of study performed, diabetes mellitus, and coexistent heart disease were found to be associated with a statistically significant increased risk of postangiographic ARD.

Explore related subjects

Acute Kidney InjuryAge FactorsAngiographyContrast MediaCreatinineDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansKidney DiseasesKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedRiskJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A S Gomes, J D Baker, V Martin-Paredero, S M Dixon, H Takiff, H I Machleder, W S Moore. 1985. Acute renal dysfunction after major arteriography.. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.145.6.1249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2013

The identification of novel potential injury mechanisms and candidate biomarkers in renal allograft rejection by quantitative proteomics.

Early transplant dysfunction and failure because of immunological and nonimmunological factors still presents a significant clinical problem for transplant recipients. A critical unmet need is the noninvasive detection and prediction of immune injury such that acute injury can be reversed by proactive immunosuppression titration. In this study, we used iTRAQ -based proteomic discovery and targeted ELISA validation to discover and validate candidate urine protein biomarkers from 262 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed allograft injury. Urine samples were randomly split into a training set of 108 patients and an independent validation set of 154 patients, which comprised the clinical biopsy-confirmed phenotypes of acute rejection (AR) (n = 74), stable graft (STA) (n = 74), chronic allograft injury (CAI) (n = 58), BK virus nephritis (BKVN) (n = 38), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (n = 8), and healthy, normal control (HC) (n = 10). A total of 389 proteins were measured that displayed differential abundances across urine specimens of the injury types (p < 0.05) with a significant finding that SUMO2 (small ubiquitin-related modifier 2) was identified as a "hub" protein for graft injury irrespective of causation. Sixty-nine urine proteins had differences in abundance (p < 0.01) in AR compared with stable graft, of which 12 proteins were up-regulated in AR with a mean fold increase of 2.8. Nine urine proteins were highly specific for AR because of their significant differences (p < 0.01; fold increase >1.5) from all other transplant categories (HLA class II protein HLA-DRB1, KRT14, HIST1H4B, FGG, ACTB, FGB, FGA, KRT7, DPP4). Increased levels of three of these proteins, fibrinogen beta (FGB; p = 0.04), fibrinogen gamma (FGG; p = 0.03), and HLA DRB1 (p = 0.003) were validated by ELISA in AR using an independent sample set. The fibrinogen proteins further segregated AR from BK virus nephritis (FGB p = 0.03, FGG p = 0.02), a finding that supports the utility of monitoring these urinary proteins for the specific and sensitive noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1992

[Renal crisis in scleroderma].

A case is described of a 30-year-old woman with scleroderma renal crisis. She presented with classical symptoms: malignant hypertension of sudden onset and rapidly progressive renal failure. End-stage renal failure developed in spite of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the patient became dialysis-dependent. Five years later her condition was still stable. She lived in a nursing home, severely disabled but mentally healthy. A renal crisis is one of the most life threatening complications of scleroderma. By immediate treatment with ACE inhibitors, dependence on haemodialysis can be prevented in half the patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1992

Plasma endothelin immunoreactivity in liver disease and the hepatorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Severe renal vasoconstriction is central to the pathogenesis of renal failure in the hepatorenal syndrome. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 are potent, long-acting vasoconstrictors, and endothelin-1 has selective potency as a renal vasoconstrictor. These properties suggest a role for endothelins in the hepatorenal syndrome. METHODS: We measured plasma endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 concentrations using specific radioimmunoassays in subjects with hepatorenal syndrome, liver disease but normal renal function, chronic renal failure, acute renal failure, liver dysfunction and renal impairment, or normal liver and kidney function. RESULTS: The patients with the hepatorenal syndrome had markedly elevated mean (+/- SE) plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 (36 +/- 5 ng per liter [14.5 +/- 1.8 pmol per liter]) and endothelin-3 (43 +/- 3 ng per liter [16.3 +/- 1.0 pmol per liter]) as compared with the normal subjects (endothelin-1, 4 +/- 1 ng per liter [1.7 +/- 0.2 pmol per liter]; and endothelin-3, 18 +/- 1 ng per liter [6.8 +/- 0.4 pmol per liter]; P < 0.001) and with the patients in the other four groups (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). The plasma endothelin-1, but not endothelin-3, concentrations in these four patient groups were significantly higher than in the normal subjects (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). The concentrations of endothelin-1 in renal arterial plasma and renal venous plasma, measured in five patients with the hepatorenal syndrome and three with chronic liver disease and normal renal function, were 20 +/- 4 ng per liter (7.9 +/- 1.8 pmol per liter) and 24 +/- 4 ng per liter (9.5 +/- 1.5 pmol per liter), respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in plasma endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 concentrations in patients with the hepatorenal syndrome is consistent with the hypothesis that these substances have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Acute Kidney Injury↗