PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3942336

Do anesthetics fluidize membranes?

Abstract

The so-called membrane fluidizing effect of anesthetics as a cause of anesthesia has been questioned, mainly because the magnitude of the increase in "fluidity" is insignificant at clinically relevant anesthetic pressures. However, the term "fluidity" has an unfortunate history of being misrepresented in membrane biology. It is often expressed as the ease of movement of probe molecules incorporated into the hydrophobic region of the membrane, thereby representing the property of the microenvironment where the probe molecules reside. In surface chemistry, "membrane fluidity" means inverse viscosity. Membrane viscosity is an integral property of a total membrane (not a part of membrane), and membrane molecules must dislocate and flow against resistance. The ease of motion of probe molecules, therefore, is not fluidity, and is now expressed by the order parameter. The present study measured the effect of halothane on surface viscosity of a phospholipid monolayer spread on a water surface by an oscillating pendulum surface viscometer. The results indicate a significant decrease of about 31% in the surface viscosity by the clinical pressure of halothane; anesthetics do fluidize membranes. Two factors contribute to the surface viscosity of the lipid monolayer; the property of the membrane proper (association between phospholipid molecules) and dragging of water (association between phospholipid and water molecules). The association between phospholipid molecules is in large part related to the order parameter. The fact that anesthetics show little effect on the order parameter, whereas halothane shows a significant effect on the membrane viscosity, indicates that halothane releases surface-bound water. It is postulated that the primary effect of anesthetics on membranes is to weaken the lipid-water interaction forces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Ueda, M Hirakawa, K Arakawa, H Kamaya. 1986. Do anesthetics fluidize membranes?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198601000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Early detection of anthracycline cardiotoxicity in a rabbit model: left ventricle filling pattern versus troponin T determination.

Anthracycline cardiotoxicity represents a serious risk of anticancer chemotherapy. The aim of the present pilot study was to compare the potential of both the left ventricular (LV) filling pattern evaluation and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) plasma levels determination for the early detection of daunorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rabbits. The echocardiographic measurements of transmitral LV inflow as well as cTnT determinations were performed weekly for 10 weeks in daunorubicin (3 mg/kg weekly) and control groups (n=5, each). Surprisingly, no significant changes in LV-filling pattern were observed through the study, most likely due to the xylazine-containing anesthesia, necessary for appropriate resolving of the E and A waves. In contrast to the echographic measurement, the dP/dt(min) index obtained invasively at the end of the study revealed a significant impairment in LV relaxation, which was further supported by observed disturbances in myocardial collagen content and calcium homeostasis. However, at the same time cTnT plasma levels were progressively rising in the daunorubicin-treated animals from the fifth week (0.024+/-0.008 microg/l) until the end of the experiment (0.186+/-0.055 microg/l). Therefore, in contrast to complicated non-invasive evaluation of diastolic function, cTnT is shown to be an early and sensitive marker of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the rabbit model.

Anesthetics↗

Identification of a molecular target mediating the general anesthetic actions of pentobarbital.

Barbiturates were introduced into medical practice in 1934. They are widely used today as general anesthetics. Although in vitro studies revealed that the activity of a variety of ligand-gated channels is modulated by barbiturates, the target(s) mediating the anesthetic actions of barbiturates in vivo are unknown. Studying pentobarbital action in beta3(N265M) mice harboring beta3-containing GABAA receptors insensitive to a variety of general anesthetic agents, we found that the immobilizing action of pentobarbital is mediated fully, and the hypnotic action is mediated in part by this receptor subtype. It was surprising that the respiratory depressant action of pentobarbital is indistinguishable between beta3(N265M) and wild-type mice and thus is mediated by other as-yet-unidentified targets. Whereas the target for the immobilizing and hypnotic actions of pentobarbital seems to be the same as for etomidate and propofol, these latter agents' respiratory depressant actions are mediated by beta3-containing GABAA receptors. Thus, in contrast to etomidate and propofol, pentobarbital can elicit respiratory depression by a beta3-independent pathway. Pentobarbital reduced heart rate and body temperature to a slightly smaller extent in beta3(N265M) mice compared with wild-type mice, indicating that these actions are largely mediated by other targets. Pentobarbital-induced increase of heart rate variability and prolongation of ECG intervals are seen in both beta3(N265M) mice and wild-type mice, suggesting that they are not dependent on beta3-containing GABAA receptors. In summary, we show a clear pharmacological dissociation of the immobilizing/hypnotic and respiratory/cardiovascular actions of pentobarbital.

Anesthetics↗