PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3948762

Decision making in laboratory test studies.

Abstract

Evaluation of laboratory tests can be made at multiple levels. Evaluation at the levels of operational and decision making usefulness may be the most important but most neglected areas of analysis. Although quantitative models for such analysis are available, their application is often hindered by lack of precise probability measurements, unavailability of sensitivity and specificity data, and a poor understanding of the decision making process by physicians. A general understanding of such models and their mathematic principles have been presented with the hope that this will improve the diagnostic usefulness and application of the laboratory tests to be discussed in the remainder of this volume.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B McCabe. 1986. Decision making in laboratory test studies.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3948762/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of six methods for the extraction of lipids from serum in terms of effectiveness and protein preservation.

The present work compares six biochemical methods for extraction of lipids from human serum. Although some organic solvents were good lipid extractors, they precipitated most of the total proteins and albumin. On the other hand, methodologies using Triton X-114 and silica were efficient for extraction of lipids, while sparing the protein fraction.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗

False-positive results and contamination in nucleic acid amplification assays: suggestions for a prevent and destroy strategy.

Contamination of samples with DNA is still a major problem in microbiology laboratories, despite the wide acceptance of PCR and other amplification techniques for the detection of frequently low amounts of target DNA. This review focuses on the implications of contamination in the diagnosis and research of infectious diseases, possible sources of contaminants, strategies for prevention and destruction, and quality control. Contamination of samples in diagnostic PCR can have far-reaching consequences for patients, as illustrated by several examples in this review. Furthermore, it appears that the (sometimes very unexpected) sources of contaminants are diverse (including water, reagents, disposables, sample carry over, and amplicon), and contaminants can also be introduced by unrelated activities in neighboring laboratories. Therefore, lack of communication between researchers using the same laboratory space can be considered a risk factor. Only a very limited number of multicenter quality control studies have been published so far, but these showed false-positive rates of 9-57%. The overall conclusion is that although nucleic acid amplification assays are basically useful both in research and in the clinic, their accuracy depends on awareness of risk factors and the proper use of procedures for the prevention of nucleic acid contamination. The discussion of prevention and destruction strategies included in this review may serve as a guide to help improve laboratory practices and reduce the number of false-positive amplification results.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗