PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3950949

Comparison of theoretically oriented and patient-oriented behavioral science courses.

Abstract

Effective teaching of medical behavioral science is an important challenge for psychiatrists. Two behavioral science courses taught at different times at the Yale University School of Medicine are described: a theoretically oriented course emphasizing symbolic function, primary source reading, and conceptual thinking and a patient-oriented course emphasizing the relevance of behavioral science to the practice of medicine, taught primarily by consultation-liaison psychiatrists. Students' evaluations of the two courses during the fifth year each course was taught were compared. The students' acceptance of the patient-oriented course was dramatically greater than that of the theoretically oriented course. The class mean scores on the behavioral science subtest of the Part I examination of the National Board of Medical Examiners during the last four years that the courses were taught were compared. The mean scores of the classes that had taken the patient-oriented course were significantly higher than those of the classes that had taken the theoretically oriented course. The mean score for the class that took the fifth year of the patient-oriented course was 52 points higher than the mean score for the class that took the fifth year of the theoretically oriented course. The authors concluded that the skills that consultation-liaison psychiatrists use every day in their work may be exactly those that are useful in teaching a successful behavioral science course for medical students.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Leigh, M F Reiser. 1986. Comparison of theoretically oriented and patient-oriented behavioral science courses.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198603000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Value of high-cost cancer care: a behavioral science perspective.

Concerns about the high costs of cancer care have led to a renewed interest in understanding how patients value the outcomes of care. Psychologists, economists, and others have highlighted some of the ways in which patients and caregivers perceive and make treatment decisions. Prospect theory is the predominant framework for understanding decisions made in situations where the outcomes of each choice are uncertain. Prospect theory assumes that a patient values the outcomes of care not in absolute terms, such as years of life saved, but as deviations from the patient's point of reference. This article discusses some of the implications of this notion, along with discussing differences among people in their reference points. These and other considerations from the psychology of decision making help to clarify why some patients might be inclined to seek expensive or risky treatments in the hopes of achieving benefits that others might consider not worthwhile. An appreciation of these psychological issues might improve the quality of debates concerning the rising costs of cancer care.

Behavioral Sciences↗