PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 396835

Error measures for objective assessment of scene segmentation algorithms.

Abstract

Scene segmentation is an important element in pattern recognition problems. Previous efforts to evaluate and compare scene segmentation procedures have been largely subjective. Quantitative error measures would facilitate objective comparison of scene segmentation algorithms. A theoretical discussion leading to a new generalized quantitative error measure, G2, based on comparison of both pixel class proportions and spatial distributions of "true" and test segmentations, is presented. This error measure was tested on 14 manual segmentations and 40 gynecologic cytology specimens segmented with five different scene segmentation techniques. Results indicate that G2 seems to have the desirable properties of correlation with human observation, categorization of error allowing for weighting, invariance with picture size and ease of computation necessary for a useful scene segmentation error measure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Yasnoff, W Galbraith, J W Bacus. Error measures for objective assessment of scene segmentation algorithms.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/396835/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of sample-diluent interactions on surface tension and pressures in continuous flow manifolds.

When a plasma sample is aspirated into a continuous flow analyser the internal pressure of the manifold increases. The pressure change is the result of insufficient detergent present to bind all the protein in the sample, and is a potential source of inaccuracy and imprecision in the assay. It is recommended that Brij 35 be used at a concentration 10 times above the binding capacity of the albumin in the sample, to minimise changes in pressure between samples.

Autoanalysis