PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3973234

Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity.

T M van Veen·T Houtgast
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The effect of sharpening or smoothing the spectral envelopes of synthetic vowel-like sounds on the dissimilarities perceived among these sounds was investigated by means of triadic comparisons. When a spectral envelope (dB on a log-frequency scale) is considered the sum of a series of sinusoidal spectral modulations (or ripples) of different densities (the ripple spectrum), spectral sharpening or smoothing can be described as an amplification or attenuation of a part of the original ripple spectrum. For a set of nine sounds comprising different degrees of spectral sharpening of a single vowel, the perceived dissimilarities were found to be dominated by a specific part of the ripple spectrum, i.e., by spectral modulations with a density of about 2 ripples/oct. The possible role of lateral suppression in relation to this dominant region is discussed. For a set of 18 sounds comprising six vowels, each in three different versions (sharpened, normal, or smoothed), the dissimilarities were found to be determined mainly by the global shape of the spectral envelopes, i.e., by spectral modulations up to about 1.5-2 ripples/oct. Details of the spectral envelope (including the region of 2 ripples/oct where lateral suppression is effective) appear to be of minor influence on vowel dissimilarities.

Explore related subjects

Auditory PerceptionHumansPhoneticsPsychoacousticsSound SpectrographyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M van Veen, T Houtgast. 1985. Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391880

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed2006

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗