PubMed · 3979278
[Rectoscopy: rigid or flexible? A comparative study].
Abstract
The customary rigid rectoscope was compared prospectively, with a new, flexible one (prototypes of Olympus Opt. and Fuji) in each of 114 patients selected at random. Maximal depth of introduction was reached on average after 1 min with the rigid instruments, after 1 min 40 sec with the flexible one. Mean depth of introduction was 16 cm for the rigid and 33 cm for the flexible one. In 21 patients (18.4%) additional information was obtained with the flexible rectoscope. 80% of patients reported that the flexible instrument caused them no or only slight discomfort. Skill in using the flexible instrument can be quickly acquired.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Classen, J Phillip, K Knyrim, H Hertel. 1985-03-22. [Rectoscopy: rigid or flexible? A comparative study].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1068843
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.