PubMed · 4010960
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F E Musiek, A G Reeves. 1985. Testing dichotic listening.. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.7.1087-a
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A number of studies have reported correlations between subjects' asymmetry scores on left and right hemisphere specialized tasks. In this paper we report the results of meta-analyses performed on these correlations. Results showed positive correlations between subjects' asymmetry scores on left and right hemisphere specialized tasks in both modalities (asymmetry scores were computed as R-L for both left and right hemisphere specialized tasks). Thus, in both modalities, some of the between-subjects variability in asymmetry scores appears to reflect non-stimulus specific individual differences in perceptual asymmetry. For the visual asymmetry tasks, results also showed that the subjects' asymmetry scores on left and right hemisphere specialized tasks were more highly correlated under conditions of bilateral than unilateral input. This finding suggests that bilateral tasks may be more sensitive to "characteristic perceptual asymmetry" than unilateral tasks.
We investigated the possible influence of common "demand characteristics" on the results on behavioral language laterality tasks. The demand characteristics were (1) whether Ss were or were not recruited for study according to their handedness, and (2) whether a detailed familial sinistrality inquiry was conducted before or after the tasks. Tasks were the Dichotic Consonant Vowel Task (DCVT) and the Bilateral Object Naming Latency Task (BONLT). Results showed no effect of demand characteristics on the BONLT. On the DCVT, however, prior inquiry regarding familial sinistrality was associated with significantly reduced right ear advantages (REAs). Interactions showed that the greatest reduction in REAs occurred in Ss with left-handedness in their families, who were asked about familial sinistrality prior to the tasks, who took the DCVT after the BONLT, and who were also recruited by handedness. Results, though generally reassuring regarding the robustness of the tasks against these sources of bias, raise some cautions for the DCVT.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.