PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 4020011

A case in point extended.

E Goodlaw
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

No visual examination can be considered complete without visual field investigation. Garmizo suggests at least a hand confrontation, and Goodlaw urges a refinement of this procedure using a wand with a 3" by 3" background to a 3mm target. There is also a question of body clues to hand location when the hand is the target. This suggested procedure circumvents this by using a 6" to 8" long handle on the target.

Explore related subjects

CuesHumansVisual Field TestsVisual FieldsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Goodlaw. 1985. A case in point extended.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4020011/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗
PubMed2007

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗