PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 4020517

Spatial and spatial-frequency primitives in spatial-interval discrimination.

M J Morgan·R M Ward
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thresholds for spatial-interval discrimination were determined under conditions designed to introduce randomness in the spatial-frequency content of the stimuli from trial to trial. Neither a random scaling of the display nor the addition of flanking bars at varying distances affected the observer's ability to judge the relative interval between pairs of bars, provided that the flanking bars were clearly resolved from the targets. Performance deteriorated only if the flanking bars were too close (less than about 2 arc min) or if the display was optically blurred. We conclude that the results pose difficulties for spatial-frequency theories of interval discrimination.

Explore related subjects

Discrimination, PsychologicalHumansModels, BiologicalPhotic StimulationRandom AllocationSpace PerceptionClinical TrialJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Morgan, R M Ward. 1985. Spatial and spatial-frequency primitives in spatial-interval discrimination.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.001205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1992

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological↗