PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 4020519

Distance perception with holographically reconstructed objects.

Abstract

It has been assumed that a holographically reconstructed object is seen as though it is the actual object, including that it is seen at the distance of the actual object when it was holographed. A psychophysical experiment was carried out with seven subjects to test this assumption. The results clearly show that the perceived distances of holographically reconstructed objects are not equivalent to the perceived distances of actual objects. Thus a fundamental assumption in holography has not been supported by experimental data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Frey, R D Frey. 1985. Distance perception with holographically reconstructed objects.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.001217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The right questions to assess materials. Selecting distance learning material.

1. Distance learning provides real educational opportunities, equal to and complementary with, traditional taught programme approaches. 2. Important questions to ask about distance learning include relevance to practice, accessibility, quality assurance, assessment and value for money. 3. Distance learning need not be lonely and isolating, and can provide education that travels with students--important in today's professional context.

Distance Perception

Spatial scale dependent in-phase and anti-phase directional biases in the perception of self-organized motion patterns.

A long row of evenly spaced dots is displaced on successive frames by half the distance between the dots. Although these stimuli are directionally ambiguous, spatially and temporally coherent unidirectional and oscillatory motion patterns are perceived as a result of the temporal persistence of competing in-phase and anti-phase directional biases, respectively. The perceiver's spatial scale is critical is determining whether dots are near enough to favor an in-phase bias or far enough apart to favor an anti-phase bias. The results are explained by a differential-gradient model of cooperative interaction, which specifies that the strength of facilitating (excitatory) interactions among motion detectors with similar directional selectivity falls off with distance at a greater rate than the strength of competing inhibiting interactions.

Distance Perception

How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality.

This study investigated absolute estimation of size and distance for natural and artificial objects at viewing distances of 1.1-15.3 km (Experiments 1 and 2) and 0.4-5.0 m (Experiment 3). The main results were that, regardless of distance range, size and distance estimates (S' and D') were related to objective size and distance (S and D), respectively, by a power function with an exponent of unity, but great individual differences in exponent were obtained for the far objects. The ratio S'/D' was reasonably represented by S'/D' = K theta n and S'/D' = tan(a theta +b), rather than S'/D' = tan theta, where theta is the visual angle. Partial correlations were obtained to examine whether (1) apparent size is determined by taking apparent distance into account or (2) both apparent size and apparent distance are determined directly by external stimuli. The combined data for the far objects and the data for the close objects showed that there were high correlations between S and S' and between D and D' and a low correlation between D' and S'. The data of Experiment 2 showed that both D' and S' were highly correlated with S, D, and theta, and there was a high positive correlation between D' and S'. It was suggested that the direct-perception model is valid under some situations, but the taking-into-account model is not supported in any set of data.

Distance Perception