PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 4023468

[A personal sampling and an area sampling--exposure concentration and environmental concentration].

I Tanaka·T Akiyama
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Two methods for the evaluation of air contaminant in a work environment are personal sampling to measure the exposure concentration for the evaluation of the exposure level to workers and area sampling that measures the environmental concentration for the evaluation of the clean level in the work environment. The aim of these samplings is different but they are used to measure the concentration in the same work environment. It is important to understand the difference between the exposure concentration and the environmental one in the same work environment. In this report, the relationship between the exposure concentration and the environmental one is investigated by using previous reported data. The difference between the exposure concentration and the environmental one is very large for all data, but the exposure concentrations agree well with the environmental ones when the both concentrations were measured by the same apparatus in some work environments.

Explore related subjects

Air Pollutants, OccupationalAsbestosDustEnvironmental ExposureLeadMethodsOccupational MedicineComparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Tanaka, T Akiyama. 1985-06-01. [A personal sampling and an area sampling--exposure concentration and environmental concentration].. https://doi.org/10.7888/juoeh.7.207

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Exposure to mercury in the mine of Almaden.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process for obtaining mercury and the historical exposure of Almadén miners to mercury. METHODS: Information on every workplace and historical data on production, technological changes in the productive process and biological and environmental values of mercury was collected. A job-exposure matrix was built with these values and the exposure to inorganic mercury was estimated quantitatively as mug/l of urine mercury. A cumulative exposure index was calculated for every worker by adding the estimates for every year in the different workplaces. RESULTS: In the mine, the highest exposures occurred during drilling, with values up to 2.26 mg/m3 in air, 2194 microg/l in urine and 374 microg/l in blood. Furnace operation and cleaning were the tasks with the highest values in metallurgy, peaking up to 3.37 mg/m3. The filling of bottles with mercury by free fall gave values within a range of 1.13-2.43 mg/m3 in air; these values dropped to 0.32-0.83 mg/m3 after introducing a new ventilation system. The toxicity effects of high doses of inorganic mercury on the central nervous and urinary systems have been known for decades. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure of the workers in Almadén mines to mercury has been very high. The extremely high content cinnabar ore of the mine explains the increased concentrations of mercury in air at the work places. This, together with inadequate working conditions, explains the high mercury levels found in blood and urine during the study period.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗
PubMed2007

Influence of start-up on PCDD/F emission of incinerators.

This study aims to evaluate the influence of start-up on polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) concentration in the stack flue gas of incinerators and its contributing PCDD/F emission. The PCDD/F emission of the first sample among three consecutive stack flue gas samples of five intermittent incinerators, which sampled at a stable combustion condition after start-up, is 2-3 times higher than the mean of the others. For verifying the PCDD/F characteristics of incinerators during start-up, one continuous MSWI was investigated for two years. The elevated PCDD/F emissions of the MSWI during start-up could reach 96.9 ng I-TEQN m(-3) and still maintained a high PCDD/F emission (40 times higher than the Taiwan emission limit) even 18 h after the injection of activated carbon, indicating the memory effect. Taking the MSWI for example, which consists of four incinerators, the estimated annual PCDD/F emission from normal operational conditions was 0.112 g I-TEQ. However, one start-up procedure can generate approximately 60% of the PCDD/F emissions for one whole year of normal operations. And the PCDD/F emission, which is the result of the start-ups of four incinerators, was at least two times larger than that of a whole year's normal operations, without consideration for the PCDD/F emission contributed by the long lasting memory effect.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗