PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4028485

Rationale for office-based foot surgery.

Abstract

It is clear from this study that the majority of foot surgical cases being done in the United States may be performed in an office-based surgical setting when individual case considerations are made on a case-by-case basis. This entire study reflects the importance of physician preference relative to selecting a surgical environment for management of disorders and surgery of the foot. In some areas, a strong consensus of opinion existed concerning one surgical location or the other, but the overwhelming majority of responses indicated a case-by-case evaluation prior to physician selection of the surgical environment. The Delphi study was well validated by the survey of Alabama podiatrists in this regard. Traditionally, within the United States, the physician has acted as an agent to the patient and as an allocator of health care resources. Perhaps current concepts regarding patient hospitalization for certain surgical procedures would change if the physician were motivated (either intellectually or financially) toward office-based surgery on a individual case basis. Perhaps, in selected elective surgical procedures, patients could be sufficiently informed so that they could voice an opinion or preference relative to selection of the surgical environment. Additional research in this area is necessary. Expanded insight into established patterns of patient hospitalization practices and general anesthesia usage on these hospitalized patients may also be in order. Realizing full well the role of independent physician judgment in these matters, it may be that selection of general anesthesia and hospitalization for some elective surgery procedures reflects the physician's training rather than his appreciation of alternate routes for rendering reasonable and responsible care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Wood. 1985. Rationale for office-based foot surgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4028485/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗