PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4035299

Critical stimulus duration: schizophrenic trait or state?

Abstract

Recent evidence challenges the conclusion of Nuechterlein and Dawson (1984) that a critical stimulus duration (CSD) may be a likely candidate for a state marker of schizophrenia. We summarize the results of three different CSD investigations which used differing schizotypic detection criteria and report that the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) 2-7-8 schizotypic profile identified vulnerable college students with a CSD deficit. On the basis of these data, we suggest that the CSD task should not be considered a state marker of schizophrenia and may qualify as a trait marker of a specific subgroup of schizophrenia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Merritt, D W Balogh. 1985. Critical stimulus duration: schizophrenic trait or state?. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul%2F11.3.341

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗