PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4035300

Increased critical stimulus duration: vulnerability or episode indicator?

Abstract

Increased critical stimulus duration among nonpsychotic subjects with Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-7-8 profiles in the Merritt and Balogh letter-discrimination procedure is consistent with the view that this abnormality might be a vulnerability indicator for a poor prognosis, chronic type of schizophrenia. However, the procedure that Merritt and Balogh used to measure critical stimulus duration is likely to involve higher load on processing capacity than the procedure used by Braff and Saccuzzo with patients who showed schizotypal personality disorder. Thus, consistent with our hypothesis, the Merritt and Balogh procedure appears more likely to detect a deficit among persons at risk for schizophrenia than procedures that involve little or no demand on processing capacity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K H Nuechterlein, M E Dawson. 1985. Increased critical stimulus duration: vulnerability or episode indicator?. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul%2F11.3.344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗