PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4067628

Visually induced adaptive changes in primate saccadic oculomotor control signals.

Abstract

Saccades are the rapid eye movements used to change visual fixation. Normal saccades end abruptly with very little postsaccadic ocular drift, but acute ocular motor deficits can cause the eyes to drift appreciably after a saccade. Previous studies in both patients and monkeys with peripheral ocular motor deficits have demonstrated that the brain can suppress such postsaccadic drifts. Ocular drift might be suppressed in response to visual and/or proprioceptive feedback of position and/or velocity errors. This study attempts to characterize the adaptive mechanism for suppression of postsaccadic drift. The responses of seven rhesus monkeys were studied to postsaccadic retinal slip induced by horizontal exponential movements of a full-field stimulus. After several hours of saccade-related retinal image slip, the eye movements of the monkeys developed a zero-latency, compensatory postsaccadic ocular drift. This ocular drift was still evident in the dark, although smaller (typically 15% of the amplitude of the antecedent saccade, up to a maximum drift of 8 degrees). Retinal slip alone, without a net displacement of the image, was sufficient to elicit these adaptive changes, and compensation for leftward and rightward saccades was independent. It took several days to complete adaptation, but recovery (in the light) was much quicker. The decay of this adaptation in darkness was very slow; after 3 days the ocular drift was reduced by less than 50%. The time constants of single exponential curve fits to adaptation time courses of data from five animals were 35 h for acquisition, 4 h for recovery, and at least 40 h for decay in darkness. Descriptions of the central innervation for a saccade are usually simplified to only two components: a pulse and a step. It has been hypothesized that suppression of pathological postsaccadic drift is achieved by adjusting the ratio of the pulse to the step of innervation (19, 26). However, we show that the time constant of the ocular drift is influenced by the time constant of the adapting stimulus, which cannot be explained by the simple pulse-step model of saccadic innervation. A more realistic representation of the saccadic innervation has three components: a pulse, an exponential slide, and a step. Normal saccades were accurately simulated by a fourth-order, linear model of the ocular motor plant driven by such a pulse-slide-step combination. Saccades made after prolonged exposure to optically induced retinal image slip could also be simulated by properly adjusting the slide and step components.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M Optican, F A Miles. 1985. Visually induced adaptive changes in primate saccadic oculomotor control signals.. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1985.54.4.940

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phototransduction in mouse rods and cones.

Phototransduction is the process by which light triggers an electrical signal in a photoreceptor cell. Image-forming vision in vertebrates is mediated by two types of photoreceptors: the rods and the cones. In this review, we provide a summary of the success in which the mouse has served as a vertebrate model for studying rod phototransduction, with respect to both the activation and termination steps. Cones are still not as well-understood as rods partly because it is difficult to work with mouse cones due to their scarcity and fragility. The situation may change, however.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Oculomotor plasticity: are mechanisms of adaptation for reactive and voluntary saccades separate?

Saccadic eye movements are permanently controlled and their accuracy maintained by adaptive mechanisms that compensate for physiological or pathological perturbations. In contrast to the adaptation of reactive saccades (RS) which are automatically triggered by the sudden appearance of a single target, little is known about the adaptation of voluntary saccades which allow us to intentionally scan our environment in nearly all our daily activities. In this study, we addressed this issue in human subjects by determining the properties of adaptation of scanning voluntary saccades (SVS) and comparing these features to those of RS. We also tested the reciprocal transfers of adaptation between the two saccade types. Our results revealed that SVS and RS adaptations disclosed similar adaptation fields, time course and recovery levels, with only a slightly lower after-effect for SVS. Moreover, RS and SVS main sequences both remained unaffected after adaptation. Finally and quite unexpectedly, the pattern of adaptation transfers was asymmetrical, with a much stronger transfer from SVS to RS (79%) than in the reverse direction (22%). These data demonstrate that adaptations of RS and SVS share several behavioural properties but at the same time rely on partially distinct processes. Based on these findings, it is proposed that adaptations of RS and SVS may involve a neural network including both a common site and two separate sites specifically recruited for each saccade type.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Remote facilitation in the Fourier domain.

To explore spatial interactions between visual mechanisms in the Fourier domain we measured detection thresholds for vertical and horizontal sine-wave gratings (4.4 deg diameter) over a range of spatial frequencies (0.5-23 c/deg) in the presence of grating and plaid masks with component contrasts of 8%, orientations of +/-45 degrees and a spatial frequency of 1c/deg. The mask suppressed the target grating over a range of +/-1 octave, and the plaid produced more suppression than the grating, consistent with summation of mask components in a broadly tuned contrast gain pool. At greater differences in spatial frequency ( approximately 3 octaves), the plaid and grating masks both produced about 3 dB of facilitation (they reduced detection thresholds by a factor of about square root 2). At yet further distances ( approximately 4 octaves) the masks had no effect. The facilitation cannot be attributed to a reduction of uncertainty by the mask because (a) it occurs for mask components that have very different spatial frequencies and orientations from the test and (b) the large stimulus size and central fixation point mean there was no spatial uncertainty that could be reduced. We suggest the results are due to long-range sensory interactions (in the Fourier domain) between mask and test-channels. The effects could be due to either direct facilitation or disinhibition.

Adaptation, Ocular↗