PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 4079595

Evaluation of bioavailability by different methods.

Abstract

Demonstration of bioavailability (or bioequivalence) is a condition for marketing of a drug product, unless a waiver is granted. Biovailability is usually based on some statistical evaluation of three parameters, the area under the concentration-time curve, AUC, the peak concentration, Cmax, and the peak time, tmax, obtained for both the test drug product and the standard, using a crossover design with 12 to 24 subjects. The three biovailability parameters can be obtained by various mathematical procedures, and may vary according to the procedure selected and the operator's decision. The purpose of this study was to compare two of the most widely used evaluation procedures, a curve-fitting method (NONLIN 84) and the linear trapezoidal rule, with a recently developed compartment model and operator input independent procedure, KINPAK. As the model drug, theophylline was used after single dose administration (experimental sustained-release tablet vs elixir) and multiple dose administration (experimental sustained-release tablet vs Theodur). Theophylline exhibits not only large interindividual, but also intraindividual, variations in its disposition. Accepting the postulate that biovailability is a biologic quality control test, KINPAK not only recognizes outliers of concentration-time data within a sequence of individual data sets but also outliers within a sample of individuals. Neither for the single dose study nor for the multiple dose study were significant differences found between the various evaluation methods. This cannot be guaranteed for other studies. KINPAK offers primarily the following advantages, standardized computation of all pharmacokinetic parameters derivable from a concentration-time course without making arbitrary model assumption, more or less questionable data points are recognized, omitted, but listed, automatic tabulation and/or plotting of raw data and evaluation results without transcription errors, ready for submission to regulatory agencies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Ritschel, S A Hussain, B Schneider, G Betzien, B Kaufmann. 1985. Evaluation of bioavailability by different methods.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4079595/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Organic compounds in sludge-amended soils and their potential for uptake by crop plants.

Numerous toxic organic chemicals (TOs), with a wide range of chemical properties, can occur in sewage sludges. The vast majority of sludge-borne TOs occur at low concentrations, and even lower TO concentrations are expected in sludge-amended soils. Further, most TOs are so strongly reactive in the soil-sludge matrix that their bioavailabilities to plants are expected to be low. A host of experimental techniques have been employed to measure TO plant uptake and to relate bioavailability to TO chemical and physical properties. The strengths and weaknesses of several experimental approaches are examined, and the resulting data are evaluated. Sound experimental data, especially field data and/or data from studies with endogenously sludge-borne TOs, indicate negligible contamination of crop plants with TOs in sludge-amended soils. Assessing the potential for plant uptake of sludge-borne TOs involves determining: (a) which TOs are most likely present in biosolids and what are their toxicities; (b) what quantities of TOs are likely to be added to the growth media via biosolids application; (c) what effects various dissipation/dispersion reactions have on the potential bioavailability of TOs; and (d) what are the various mechanisms for plant uptake/metabolism of TOs.

Biological Availability