PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 4121646

Discriminant value of thyroid function tests.

Abstract

Different thyroid function tests permitted a final classification of 204 consecutive patients with suspected thyroid disorders into three populations (thyrotoxic, euthyroid, and hypothyroid). Linear discriminant analysis was applied to all test results (10 variates) on adjacent population pairs. Two invitro tests (serum protein bound iodine (P.B.I.) and tri-iodothyronine (T-3) uptake values) gave good separation of thyrotoxic from euthyroid patients and fairly good distinction of hypothyroid patients. If a (131)I uptake figure was then added to the in-vitro results most patients (95.5%), including thse initially classified as equivocal, were correctly diagnosed. Other tests, including clinical questionnaires, were poor discriminants.Two new techniques of utilizing the test data were devised. Firstly, the data from the two in-vitro tests were also displayed graphically, and oblique boundary lines derived from the discriminant functions gave better separation of patients than previously used limits or mathematical expressions of "free thyroxine." Secondly, a nomogram incorporating the best four discriminants was designed as a diagnostic aid and proved to be the best means of interpreting the tests.Discriminant analysis of this kind can be used in the interpretation of diagnostic tests in any branch of medicine, and it allows the best use to be made of the available data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Barnett, A A Greenfield, P J Howlett, J C Hudson, R N Smith. 1973-04-21. Discriminant value of thyroid function tests.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5859.144

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Migraine and tension headache. New procedures for objective differentiation].

AIMS: Presentation of a new questionnaire for headache analysis that supplements a computer-aided scheme for the diagnosis of headaches. MAJOR POINTS: The classification scheme of the International Headache Society (IHS) represents an instrument for the classification and identification of headaches that makes use of phenomenological criteria. On this basis, a computer program was developed that permits clearly differentiated analysis of various common types of headache. Both primary forms of headaches and clinically relevant secondary forms are taken into account. Since many--although not all--doctor's offices are equipped with personal computers, a questionnaire has now been developed with the aid of which the two major primary forms of headache, migraine and tension headache, can be distinguished. On average, the patient takes only five minutes to complete the questionnaire. Evaluation is performed simply, with the aid of an evaluation sheet. Types of headache other than those described cannot be excluded on the basis of the questionnaire.

Diagnosis, Differential