PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 41570118

Application of qualifying variants for genomic analysis.

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Qualifying variants (QVs) are genomic alterations selected by defined criteria within analysis pipelines. Although crucial for both research and clinical diagnostics, QVs are often seen as simple filters rather than dynamic elements that influence the entire workflow. In practice these rules are embedded within pipelines, which hinders transparency, audit, and reuse across tools. A unified, portable specification for QV criteria is needed. RESULTS: Our aim is to embed the concept of a "QV" into the genomic analysis vernacular, moving beyond its treatment as a single filtering step. By decoupling QV criteria from pipeline variables and code, the framework enables clearer discussion, application, and reuse. It provides a flexible reference model for integrating QVs into analysis pipelines, improving reproducibility, interpretability, and interdisciplinary communication. Validation across diverse applications confirmed that QV based workflows match conventional methods while offering greater clarity and scalability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data are accessible at the Zenodo repository https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17414191. Manuscript files are available at https://github.com/DylanLawless/qvApp2025lawless. The QV framework is available under the MIT licence, and the dataset will be maintained for at least two years following publication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dylan Lawless, Ali Saadat, Mariam Ait Oumelloul, Simon Boutry, Veronika Stadler, Sabine Österle, Jan Armida, David Haerry, D Sean Froese, Luregn J Schlapbach, Jacques Fellay. 2026-02-03. Application of qualifying variants for genomic analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2Fbtaf676

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics