PubMed · 4159663
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1966-03-12. Low birthweight.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4159663/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Epidemiologic studies frequently obtain exposure information through subjects' self-report (personal interview or mailed questionnaire). The authors used data from a case-control study of infant leukemia, to assess the validity and reliability of maternally reported information on birth characteristics such as birth weight, reproductive history, and medical procedures. Cases were gathered from the Children's Cancer Group, a United States and Canadian cooperative clinical trails group with approximately 100 member and affiliate institutions, during 1983-1988. Telephone interviews were completed for 302 cases and 558 matched controls. Medical records of the index pregnancy were obtained for 287 cases and 467 controls. Correlations between medical charts and maternal interview were high for birth weight (r = 0.98, kappa = 0.9) and gestational age (r = 0.86, kappa = 0.6). Mean differences between the two sources were small, -10.5 g for birth weight and -0.36 weeks for gestational age. Reproductive history and medical procedures had high to moderate reliability. Problems after delivery and pregnancy complications generally had low validity and reliability. Little evidence of differential misclassification was found. Time between delivery and interview ranged from zero to 8 years and did not greatly affect reliability. This study suggests that validity and reliability of maternally reported pregnancy and delivery information may differ with the nature of the factor of interest, but is affected little by time from birth or case-control status.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that utilization of a previously described measure of acuity (ie, the score for neonatal acute physiology [SNAP]) during the first 7 postnatal days predicts which infants with a birth weight of 1500 g or less received erythrocyte transfusion during the initial hospitalization. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A regional tertiary care newborn intensive care unit at the Arizona Health Sciences Center, University Medical Center, Tucson. MATERIALS: Medical records of premature infants (birth weight, < or = 1500 g) who were admitted from October 1993 to January 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence or nonoccurrence of erythrocyte transfusion was determined in 47 infants who were compared for demographic information, phlebotomy blood loss, diagnoses, medications, and the SNAP at 0, 1, 2, and 7 days of life. RESULTS: Infants with a birth weight of 1500 g or less received a mean +/- SD of 1.9 +/- 2.9 transfusions with 22 (47%) of the infants given transfusions Infants who were given transfusions vs those who were not given transfusions were of a lower mean +/- SD birth weight (971 +/- 238 g vs 1272 +/- 144 g; P < .001) and a lower gestational age (27.7 +/- 1.6 weeks vs 30.7 +/- 2.8 weeks; P < .001), and they had a greater mean phlebotomy blood loss (3.3 +/- 1.6 mL/kg per day vs 1.4 +/- 0.5 mL/kg per day; P < .001) during the first postnatal week. The SNAP indexes in those who received transfusions were higher at 1, 2, and 7 days of life (P = .03, P = .001, and P < .001, respectively). Using stepwise logistic regression, phlebotomy blood loss and the SNAP at 7 days of life were significant predictors of the number of transfusions. The logistic model predicted which infants had been administered transfusions with 86% sensitivity and 88% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in premature infants remain under study. As earlier treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin may be more efficacious, early identification of which infants currently undergo transfusion may identify those who will receive the greatest benefit from recombinant human erythropoietin therapy. The SNAP distinguished those infants who were given transfusions from those who did not receive transfusions, even after adjusting for phlebotomy blood loss.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.