PubMed · 4159684
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1966-03-19. Why anonymous?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4159684/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The immunohistochemical detection of stringlike ramifying structures positive for fibronectin in wounds aged at least a few minutes provides valuable information on the vitality of skin lesions even before the appearance of neutrophilic granulocytes. Positive reactions for tenascin or collagen type III indicate postinfliction intervals of at least 2-3 days, whereas vital reactions for collagen type V or VI occur earliest 3 days after wounding. Collagen type I appears as spotlike fibroblast-associated reaction products in injuries aged 4 days or more, while typical stringlike ramifying fibers indicate a postinfliction interval of at least 5-6 days. Fibroblasts positively staining for laminin or heparan sulfate proteoglycan can be detected in wounds with a survival time of approximately 1.5 days or more and collagen type-IV-positive cells occur earliest 4 days after wounding, followed by alpha-smooth muscle actin expressing fibroblasts after 5 days or more. Basement membrane fragments positive for laminin, heparan sulfate proteoglycan, or collagen type IV or VII indicate a wound age of at least 4 days, and a complete restitution of the epidermal basement membrane in (surgical) wounds can be observed earliest 8 days after wound infliction. Positively reacting basement membrane fragments are absent up to a wound age of < 13 days, and the evidence of an incompletely rebuilt basement membrane indicates a postinfliction interval of less than approximately 22 days. A continuous staining of the basal cells of the newly formed epidermis for cytokeratin 5 occurs earliest 13 days after wounding, and the absence of a complete staining provides information on a wound age of < 24 days.
The legal system for the investigation of major crime appears to be rather loose, in that there are no specific statutory provisions available to a defendant to present his or her case properly and adequately in court. There are no guidelines issued to the coroners nor are there any legal powers available to them to facilitate and authorize post-mortem examinations on behalf of the defence. This paper focuses attention on this legal dilemma, and attempts to suggest possible remedies.