PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42412845

Is a Win-Win possible? Achieving pareto-optimal privacy-utility balance in fine-tuned genome language model embeddings against embedding reconstruction attacks.

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Genomic data is among the most sensitive categories of personal information, and the growing adoption of language models for sequence analysis raises significant privacy concerns. Prior work demonstrated that embeddings from general-purpose language models adapted for genomic sequences leak substantial single-nucleotide information under reconstruction attacks, and that fine-tuning embeddings can reduce this vulnerability at certain positions. However, three critical questions remain unaddressed: (i) whether privacy-utility tradeoffs are inherent constraints or configuration-dependent phenomena; (ii) whether genomic-specialized models such as DNABERT-base and Nucleotide Transformer exhibit different vulnerabilities than adapted general-purpose models; and (iii) how to statistically validate whether observed privacy improvements represent meaningful gains. Addressing these gaps is essential for guiding model selection in privacy-sensitive genomic applications. RESULTS: We systematically evaluated 13 transformer architectures, 9 general-purpose and 4 genomic-specialized, under position-specific embedding reconstruction attacks. We assessed the vulnerabilities of both pre-trained and fine-tuned models to the single-nucleotide inference-reconstruction attack using our new metrics, including error-based privacy gain and Pareto dominance scores, and statistically validated the results via paired t-tests. XLNet-Large achieved the best observed privacy protection among all evaluated models (+19.5% mean privacy gain) while maintaining competitive prediction performance. General-purpose models outperformed genomic-specialized models in 56% of pairwise comparisons. Tokenization strategy, rather than domain specialization, emerged as the primary determinant of the privacy-utility balance. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for selecting models in privacy-sensitive short-window genomic applications. All privacy claims in this work are specific to position-wise embedding reconstruction attacks and do not extend to other privacy risks, such as membership inference or training data extraction, which may respond differently to fine-tuning. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is publicly available at https://github.com/AnonymousISCBConf/Win-Win-Privacy-Utility-Analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Reem Al-Saidi, Erman Ayday, Ziad Kobti, Rola AlSeidi. 2026-07-01. Is a Win-Win possible? Achieving pareto-optimal privacy-utility balance in fine-tuned genome language model embeddings against embedding reconstruction attacks.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2Fbtag311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics