PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42531675

Emerging Principles in Spatial Functional Genomics.

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomic and proteomic atlases have enabled mapping of gene programs within intact tissues, but these measurements remain largely descriptive and do not define the mechanisms controlling tissue biology. Pooled CRISPR screening provides scalable causal interrogation of gene function but remains largely confined to dissociated systems that lack spatial context. In vivo spatial functional genomics (SFG) bridges these approaches by integrating genetic perturbations with in situ transcriptomic and proteomic readouts to measure gene function within intact tissue ecosystems. By preserving spatial organization, SFG enables interpretation of perturbations through effects on cell-cell interactions, diffusible signals, multicellular niches, and tissue architecture. Here, we outline key design axes of SFG: perturbation strategy, barcoding strategy, and phenotypic readout. We discuss computational challenges, including spatial autocorrelation, neighborhood dependence, and context-aware null modeling, and highlight how SFG reveals non-cell-autonomous, architecture-dependent mechanisms of gene function, advancing toward predictive models of tissue organization and gene function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Tepper, Trung Nguyen, Chiara Falcomatà, Brian D Brown. 2026-07-30. Emerging Principles in Spatial Functional Genomics.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2026.102814

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics