PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 426467

Visual evoked potentials and the visuogram in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Visual evoked potential (VEP) latency to a sinusoidal grating pattern was measured in each eye of 103 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and compared with results in a control group of 56 patients hospitalized for other neurological conditions. Of the 50 patients classified as having definite MS, 90% showed prolonged latency (over 131 msec) in one or both eyes. In each eye of 24 of the MS patients, psychophysical measurement of the detectability of grating patterns was obtained. This test was abnormal in 11 of 13 patients with definite MS, 3 of 4 with probable MS, and 5 of 7 with possible MS. There was no concordance between prolonged VEP latency and visual impairment as revealed by the psychophysical test. Apparently pathways determining VEP latency and spatial contrast detection may be unequally affected in MS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Bodis-Wollner, C D Hendley, L H Mylin, J Thornton. 1979. Visual evoked potentials and the visuogram in multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410050107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An empirical test for the reliability of quantal analysis based on Pascal statistics.

We have previously shown that amplitude distributions of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) can be better described by Pascal distribution when the mean quantal content (m) is not stationary but fluctuating according to gamma distribution. We have developed the procedure of estimating quantal parameters by the method of maximum likelihood. In this study, we examined empirically the reliability of this quantal parameter estimation procedure by using Monte Carlo simulations. The reliability was evaluated by absolute values of error (magnitude of error) of estimated parameters relative to the known 'true' parameters. The mean values of relative magnitude of error were relatively small unless the probability of failures was too large (greater than 0.7) or too small (less than 0.1). The values of relative magnitude of error became smaller in association with increases in the sample size. When the probability of failure was between 0.1 and 0.7, the sample size was 1000, coefficient of variation of quantal size was 0.45, the values of relative magnitude of error of estimated parameters were below 0.1. These results mean that this procedure gives relatively reliable estimates of quantal parameters with the limitation that the probability of failure is neither too large (greater than 0.7) nor too small (less than 0.1); it is preferable that the sample size is as large as 1000.

Evoked Potentials

Recent developments in neurosurgical spinal cord monitoring.

In a review 8 years ago, the then current status of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring (SCM) was discussed. Concerning future developments, that article concluded that the major challenge lay in (a) the improvement of the reliability and clinical relevance of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring, where the incidence of false-negative and false-positive results had to be reduced, and (b) the application of new techniques like motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring, which might turn out to be a method complementary to the SEP approach. Since that time, there has been a considerable amount of newly published results from intraoperative SCM, although clinical articles on exclusively neurosurgical SCM are rare (Table I). A selective literature search for the present review (primarily for the time from 1988 to 1992) yielded more than 200 citations. Eighty-one studies entered into the final evaluation; among these were 3 conference proceedings, 6 book chapters, and 10 review articles. Further, 40 clinical articles, and 22 articles on experimental work were counted. In particular, experimental studies in animals have given support to clinical monitoring by exploring the usefulness of new stimulation and recording techniques. This reappraisal only considers recent work on SEP and MEP in neurosurgical SCM with some experimental studies relevant to clinical SCM. Spinal cord monitoring in orthopaedic surgery is not evaluated in this review for reasons detailed in the article.

Evoked Potentials