PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 42714834

Integrating NECTIN4 Amplification With Membranous Nectin-4 Expression to Develop a Scoring System for Predicting Enfortumab Vedotin Response in Urothelial Carcinoma.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is standard therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), yet the predictive relevance of NECTIN4 expression-especially membranous versus cytoplasmic-remains unclear. Here, we sought to extend previous findings on NECTIN4 gene amplification in parallel with a systematic subcellular evaluation of NECTIN4 expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed 179 EV-treated mUC patients. NECTIN4 amplification was assessed by FISH and NECTIN4 protein levels by IHC. A four-tier membranous scoring algorithm (0,1+,2+,3+) adapted from CAP HER2 gastric guidelines was benchmarked against H-score. We integrated amplification status with membranous staining to refine predictive stratification and compared associations with objective response rate (ORR) to EV-301 data. RESULTS: Combining membranous and cytoplasmic compartments resulted in a median composite H-score of 260 (78.2% &#x2265;150), closely matching NECTIN4 expression prevalence reported in EV-301 (median 250; 82.6% &#x2265; 150). A &#x2265;150 cut-off enriched for EV responders in both cohorts; in EV-301 with ORR of 45.8% vs. 20% (P = 0.001). High membranous expression based on the scoring (2+/3+) predicted response (ORR 55.1% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001), with longer PFS (7.1 vs. 2.9 months; HR 0.45) and OS (12.3 vs. 6.9 months; HR 0.57), whereas cytoplasmic expression lacked predictive value. NECTIN4-amplified tumors showed particularly favorable outcomes (PFS 12.2 months; OS 30.1 months). An integrated three-tier model-amplified, non-amplified/high-membranous, and non-amplified/low-membranous-yielded ORRs of 77.2%, 42.9%, and 26.1% and separated survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our NECTIN4 scoring system integrating NECTIN4 amplification with membranous NECTIN4 expression accurately predicts outcomes, supporting combined genomic and membranous assessment as complementary biomarkers for optimizing EV selection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Niklas Kl&#xfc;mper, Thomas B&#xfc;ttner, Sebastian Rauch, Stefanie Zsch&#xe4;bitz, Florian Roghmann, Christian Bolenz, Fabienne Lange, Patricia Rausch, Friedemann Zengerling, Nadine Gaisa, Oliver Hahn, Constantin Schwab, Anna Scherping, Marieta Toma, Hendrik Heers, Phillipp Ivanyi, Guenter Niegisch, Camilla Marisa Grunewald, Christopher Darr, Pia Paffenholz, Richard Weiten, Susanne F&#xfc;ssel, Christian Thomas, Marcus Sondermann, Ulrich Sommer, Kerstin Junker, Katrin Schlack, Jozefina Casuscelli, Can Aydogdu, Dora Nieders&#xfc;&#xdf;-Beke, Steffen Rausch, Christoph Kuppe, Joshua Meeks, Bonnie Choy, Sarmad Sadeghi, Parkash Gill, Manuel Ritter, Johannes Br&#xe4;gelmann, Michael H&#xf6;lzel, Arndt Hartmann, Viktor Gr&#xfc;nwald, Jonas Saal, Markus Eckstein. 2026-09-09. Integrating NECTIN4 Amplification With Membranous Nectin-4 Expression to Develop a Scoring System for Predicting Enfortumab Vedotin Response in Urothelial Carcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0093

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗