Integrative evidence-knowledge marker selection enhances LLM-based cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell type annotation is essential for gaining biological insight from single-cell RNA sequencing data, yet manual labeling remains time-consuming and difficult to reproduce. Various computational approaches have been developed to automate this process, and recent studies suggest that large language models can infer cell types with promising accuracy in single-cell analysis. However, most workflows still rely on cluster-specific markers derived from gene expression alone or manual curation. As a result, marker selection can be sensitive to statistical criteria and dataset-dependent bias, which may lead to the selection of less informative genes or missing important markers, while providing limited biological context. RESULTS: To address this limitation, we introduce CELLIA, an LLM-based workflow for automated and robust cell type annotation. CELLIA employs an integrative evidence-knowledge marker selection strategy that combines statistical differential expression criteria with curated tissue-specific marker resources to identify informative marker genes. In benchmarking analyses of 102 cell types, this approach improved agreement with manual annotations. In addition, CELLIA achieved higher agreement in subtype-level analyses of closely related immune populations and was further evaluated in a non-immune stromal subtype setting, covering 25 cell types in total. CONCLUSION: By integrating evidence-knowledge from gene expression with curated biological prior knowledge, CELLIA provides a more stable marker selection and improves the reliability of LLM-cell type annotation.