PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42729333

Multi-omics approaches in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targets and precision medicine.

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease with limited therapeutic options and marked molecular heterogeneity. Despite available antifibrotic therapies, disease progression remains poorly predictable, highlighting the need for improved mechanistic understanding and therapeutic targeting. This review summarizes recent advances in multi-omics research to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying IPF and to identify potential biomarkers and pharmacological targets. Multi-omics studies, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiome profiling, and single-cell sequencing, have revealed key pathogenic mechanisms in IPF. Genetic susceptibility factors such as MUC5B promoter variants and telomere-related genes contribute to disease risk. Epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, plays a central role in fibrotic remodeling. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses have identified dysregulated signaling pathways, including TGF-β, mTOR, cellular senescence, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Metabolomic alterations indicate disrupted lipid and amino acid metabolism. Importantly, integration of multi-omics datasets enables the identification of molecular endotypes, candidate biomarkers, and potential therapeutic targets. However, challenges including data integration, tissue heterogeneity, limited cohort size, and the need for functional validation remain important barriers to clinical translation. Continued development of multi-omics approaches may facilitate more accurate disease classification and support the development of personalized therapeutic strategies for IPF.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wenbo Hu, Xuehui Wang. 2026-08-28. Multi-omics approaches in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targets and precision medicine.. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1899849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Omics in optic neuropathies: From molecular landscapes to personalized therapeutics.

Optic neuropathies comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders involving transient or permanent injury to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons. Clinically, these neurodegenerative conditions manifest as dyschromatopsia, decreased visual acuity, and visual field defects, and in severe cases may ultimately lead to blindness and disability. The marked heterogeneity across disease subtypes, incompletely understood etiologies, and complex pathogenic mechanisms pose substantial challenges to precise diagnosis and effective treatment. Recent advances in omics technologies - including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, single-cell and spatial sequencing, and integrative multi-omics approaches - have ushered optic nerve degenerative disease research into an era of high-resolution comprehensive investigation. In this review, we summarize representative applications of omics approaches to elucidate genetic alterations, signaling dysregulation, metabolic reprogramming, and immune responses in optic neuropathies. We further discuss the emerging potential of multi-omics in identifying early diagnostic biomarkers and informing individualized therapeutic strategies. Finally, we provide a forward-looking perspective on the future trajectory of omics technologies and their prospects in both fundamental research and clinical translation, with the overarching aim of accelerating the bench-to-bedside transition in this critical eye disease field.

biomarkers

Circulating Tumor DNA in Bladder Cancer: Current Clinical Evidence and Emerging Multi-Omics Perspectives-A Narrative Review.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a promising tool for real-time disease monitoring in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This narrative review summarizes current clinical evidence regarding ctDNA across disease stages. Methods: We examine recent translational and clinical findings, incorporating key prospective data from practice-changing trials, as well as insights into minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, treatment escalation and de-escalation strategies, and systemic barriers to adoption. Results: Postoperative ctDNA positivity consistently identifies patients with molecular residual disease (MRD) who face a substantially higher risk of recurrence and mortality, frequently preceding radiographic relapse by several months. Prospective evidence now validates ctDNA as a predictive biomarker to guide adjuvant immunotherapy escalation, while sustained ctDNA negativity correlates with high long-term disease-free survival. Beyond plasma ctDNA, emerging multi-compartment liquid biopsies-integrating urinary tumor DNA (utDNA)-demonstrate enhanced sensitivity, particularly in bladder-sparing and local surveillance settings. Furthermore, integrating genomic ctDNA profiling with novel post-transcriptional layers like epitranscriptomics offers a functional framework to capture tumor adaptation under therapeutic pressure. However, clinical translation remains constrained by a lack of assay harmonization, variable analytical sensitivity, and the need for standardized intervention thresholds. Conclusions: Longitudinal liquid biopsies are rapidly shifting MIBC management from static, stage-based paradigms toward dynamic, molecularly informed precision oncology. While ctDNA-guided strategies show robust clinical utility, prospective interventional validation and technical standardization are required before widespread routine integration.

biomarkers

Mechanism-Driven Diagnostic Development: A Specimen-Aware Framework Illustrated by Colorectal Cancer and Solid Tumours.

Translational oncology has moved rapidly from histopathology and single-analyte biomarkers toward multi-dimensional molecular profiling. Yet many clinically deployed tests still use reductionist biomarker strategies that under-represent cancer complexity. This review examines whether a mechanistic, multi-layered, and specimen-aware approach can improve cancer detection, classification, prognosis, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, and therapeutic selection. Evidence across solid tumours shows that genomic alterations alone incompletely explain tumour state, metastatic behaviour, immune evasion, or therapeutic vulnerability. Integrated genome and transcriptome analyses, proteogenomics, single-cell atlases, fragmentomic, methylation based cell-free DNA assays, metabolomics and microbiome assessments reveal clinically relevant biology that single modality tests cannot determine. Minimally invasive collected specimens can extend access to screening, diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring, but the choice of specimen should be matched to disease biology and analytes that represent mechanisms of oncogenesis. However, translation remains constrained by pre-analytical variability, contamination, differences in tumour shedding behaviour, clonal haematopoiesis, translation of generated models, incomplete external validation and uncertain downstream clinical utility for emerging platforms. This review provides a commentary on the future of cancer diagnostics, the considerations and barriers to clinical translation, the relationship between utility and dimensionality of biomarkers assessed and the emerging rationale towards mechanistically grounded integrated models.

biomarkers