PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42729963

Identification of a G-quadruplex-forming cell-free DNA fragment as a biomarker for the precise diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging, as the currently recommended surveillance strategy based on ultrasound combined with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is limited by suboptimal sensitivity and accessibility. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides a minimally invasive avenue for cancer detection. However, most existing cfDNA-based approaches either perform unreliably in low-input samples or require analytically complex workflows. Here, we systematically profiled serum cfDNA from individuals with HCC and without HCC and identified a high-abundance tumor-associated single cfDNA fragment at the FAM230F genomic region. Integrative analysis of liver assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) data revealed consistent tumor-specific chromatin accessibility at this locus, suggesting a tumor-derived origin. Structural characterization further demonstrated enrichment of G-quadruplex (G4) features within the target sequence, which may increase resistance to serum nuclease degradation and promote its preferential retention in circulation. Based on these properties, we established a qPCR-based detection workflow with clinical accessibility. In a validation cohort independent of the discovery cohort, a ΔC t cutoff of 2 was selected by maximizing the Youden index within the same cohort. The assay showed a sensitivity of 94.5% and a specificity of 90.5% for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC. Collectively, our study identifies FAM230F as a structurally stable tumor-associated cfDNA fragment and establishes a simple and scalable qPCR-based assay for HCC detection, providing a practical framework for translating cfDNA fragment analysis into clinical biomarkers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jianzhe Sun, Xucong Teng, Weizhi Zhang, Yicong Dai, Lianxin Liu, Jinghong Li. 2026-09-03. Identification of a G-quadruplex-forming cell-free DNA fragment as a biomarker for the precise diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1039/d6sc04173f

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article