PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42742174

Highly efficient base editing at PCSK9 and normal human embryo development.

Abstract

Cas9-based tools enable programmable DNA lesions for studying repair outcomes, gene function, and genome correction. In human embryos, Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks are genotoxic, causing frequent aneuploidy and large deletions1,2. Here, we evaluate DNA repair outcomes at nicks and mismatches introduced by base editors at the PCSK9 and HBG loci in human embryos. Delivering ABE8e-V106W as a protein at fertilization achieved editing at all PCSK9 alleles, supporting development to the blastocyst stage and the derivation of homozygous edited stem cell lines. No insertions or deletions were detected, although rare on-target chromosome breakage and chromosomal abnormalities occurred. Nevertheless, editing at bystander and off-target sites was mosaic, and the introduction of the editor as mRNA caused frequent embryo arrest due to guide-independent deaminase activity. Thus, unlike Cas9-induced DNA breaks, base editor-induced lesions are efficiently repaired. However, undesirable consequences for the genome and development can occur, currently precluding clinical use in reproduction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stepan Jerabek, Chanju Jung, Michelle Kappy, Qiaojin Zhao, Julie Sung, Ning Wang, Euihyun Kim, Jimin Kim, Marcos Iuri Roos Kulmann, Madeleine Bliss King, Mitchell John McAndrew, Meng Li, Sakshi Bhatele, Melisa Isado, Hong-Su Jang, Michal Dolezal, Robert Prosser, Shuangyi Xu, Gue-Ho Hwang, Iva Pichova, Jia Xu, Diego Marin, Jae-Sung Woo, Sangsu Bae, Nathan Treff, Audrone Lapinaite, Dieter Egli. 2026-09-09. Highly efficient base editing at PCSK9 and normal human embryo development.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11118-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article