PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42743015

From genotype to phenotype: understanding the genetic basis of autism.

Valsamma Eapen·Anthea A Stylianakis·Irina Voineagu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper covers some of the key findings on the topic of genetic influences in autism over the last 12-18 months, which consist of significant conceptual shifts and new insights from recent technological advances. RECENT FINDINGS: Autism is a highly heritable condition, with significant heterogeneity of the genes that influence the development of this condition. The heterogeneity of autism, and multiple pathways contributing to the development of an autistic phenotype, create challenges in our understanding, diagnosis, and management of this condition.Recent studies of common genetic variation and polygenic risk scores have focussed on resolving phenotypic heterogeneity and identifying meaningful autism subtypes. Rare-variant discovery has expanded across ancestries, the X chromosome, noncoding loci, structural variants, and tandem repeats, aided by long-read and pangenome-informed sequencing. Single-cell multiomics, spatial perturbation methods and human organoid models have connected genetic variation to cell-type-specific and developmental phenotypes, while also revealing substantial mutation-specific effects and methodological sensitivity. Genetic testing increasingly provides aetiological diagnoses and informs medical surveillance. Recent developments also illustrate the therapeutic potential of gene-first approaches for selected monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders. SUMMARY: Recent developments have expanded our understanding of the way the genetic basis of autism manifests phenotypically.

Explore related subjects

autismgeneticsphenotypeJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Valsamma Eapen, Anthea A Stylianakis, Irina Voineagu. 2026-09-11. From genotype to phenotype: understanding the genetic basis of autism.. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000001115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Guidelines for the Creation of Accessible Consent Materials and Procedures: Lessons from Research with Autistic People and People with Intellectual Disability.

Informed, voluntary, ongoing consent is a central tenet of ethical research. However, consent processes are prone to exclusionary practices and inaccessibility. Consent materials are often too long and complex to foster understanding and ensure that people make truly informed decisions to participate in research. While this complexity is problematic for all people, these challenges are compounded for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Consent materials and procedures rarely incorporate accommodations for processing and communication differences common in autism and intellectual disability. Failure to provide such accommodations ultimately threatens the conduct of ethical research. We describe lessons learned across multiple major U.S. research institutions that improved informed consent materials and procedures, with the goal of fostering responsible inclusion in research for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. We used these alternative materials and procedures in multiple research projects with samples of autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Each contributing team partnered with university human research participant protections personnel, accessibility experts, community members, and researchers to develop rigorous procedures for improving the readability and accessibility of informed consent materials. We present guidelines for designing consent materials and procedures and assert that participatory methods are vital to the success of ongoing accessibility initiatives. Adoption of understandable consent materials and accessible consent procedures can cultivate more equitable, respectful, and inclusive human research practices. Future work should expand on this work to design inclusive practices for populations with additional considerations.

autism↗