PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42746352

Epilepsy: Bridging Epidemiological Landscapes, Molecular Mechanisms, and Emerging Precision Therapeutics.

Abstract

Epilepsy ranks among the most prevalent neurological disorders worldwide, and recent years have witnessed significant advancements in understanding its epidemiological features, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic methodologies, and therapeutic approaches. This review systematically examines the epidemiology of epilepsy, highlighting pronounced regional and population-based disparities, particularly the substantial treatment gap observed in low-income countries. Regarding pathogenesis, epilepsy development involves aberrant ion channel function, neuroinflammatory processes, dysregulation of the mTOR signaling pathway, and genetic predispositions. Diagnostic innovations, including ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging, artificial intelligence-enhanced electroencephalogram analysis, and liquid biopsy techniques, have markedly enhanced the precision of epileptogenic focus localization and etiological identification. Genetic investigations have uncovered numerous epilepsy-associated genes, thereby underpinning the advancement of targeted therapies. Therapeutically, novel antiepileptic drugs, neuromodulation modalities such as vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation, alongside gene therapy, have expanded treatment options for refractory epilepsy. Nonetheless, global epilepsy management continues to confront challenges including limited drug accessibility, social stigma, and pharmacoresistance. The future trajectory emphasizes individualized and precision medicine approaches, integrating genomics, biomarker discovery, and intelligent monitoring technologies to foster comprehensive improvements in epilepsy diagnosis and treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shitao Wang, Shicong Zhao, Yuqian Cao, Hao Wang. 2026-09-11. Epilepsy: Bridging Epidemiological Landscapes, Molecular Mechanisms, and Emerging Precision Therapeutics.. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s629134

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Blood Pressure Lowering and Risk of Cancer: Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Studies.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic blood pressure (BP) lowering is typically a lifelong treatment, and both clinicians and patients may have concerns about the long-term use of antihypertensive agents and the risk for cancer. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of long-term pharmacologic BP lowering on the risk for new-onset cancer is limited, with most knowledge derived from observational studies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether long-term BP lowering affects the risk for new-onset cancer, cause-specific cancer death, and selected site-specific cancers. METHODS: Individual-level data from 42 RCTs were pooled using a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. The primary outcome was incident cancer of all types, and secondary outcomes were cause-specific cancer death and selected site-specific cancers. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the heterogeneity of the BP-lowering effect by baseline variables and over follow-up time. Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by trial, was used for the statistical analysis. For site-specific cancers, analyses were complemented with Mendelian randomization, using naturally randomized genetic variants associated with BP lowering to mimic the design of a long-term RCT. RESULTS: Data from 314,016 randomly allocated participants without known cancer at baseline were analyzed. Over a median follow-up of 4 years (Q1-Q3: 3-5 years), 17,954 participants (5.7%) developed cancer, and 4,878 (1.5%) died of cancer. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, no associations were found between reductions in systolic or diastolic BP and cancer risk (HR per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.99-1.06]; HR per 3 mm Hg reduction in diastolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.98-1.07]). No changes in relative risk for incident cancer were observed over follow-up time, nor was there evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects across baseline subgroups. No effect on cause-specific cancer death was found. For site-specific cancers, no evidence of an effect was observed, except a possible link with lung cancer risk (HR for systolic BP reduction: 1.17; 99.5% CI: 1.02-1.32). Mendelian randomization studies showed no association between systolic or diastolic BP reduction and site-specific cancers, including overall lung cancer and its subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized data analysis provided no evidence to indicate that pharmacologic BP lowering has a substantial impact, either increasing or decreasing, on the risk for incident cancer, cause-specific cancer death, or selected site-specific cancers.

epidemiology