PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42749049

Genomic and transcriptomic features of relapsed small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relapsed small cell lung cancer is characterized by treatment resistance and poor outcomes. Genomic and transcriptomic alterations in relapsed SCLC have not been characterized well. We comprehensively profiled relapsed SCLC samples along with patient-matched treatment-naive samples, when available, using whole-exome (WES), whole-genome (WGS), and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) to describe the molecular landscape of relapsed SCLC. Our goal is to identify potential novel pathways for additional functional validation and eventually novel therapeutic options. METHODS: We analyzed 54 relapsed and 27 treatment-naive SCLC samples using WES (with 26 patient-matched paired samples). A subset of the samples was also analyzed by WGS (n=28) and RNA-seq (n=31). Differences in mutational signatures, gene expression, structural variants, splicing, and neoantigen profiles at diagnosis and relapse were investigated. RESULTS: Relapsed SCLC samples demonstrated mutation signatures characteristic of platinum and APOBEC mutagenesis. Furthermore, these samples were characterized by MYC, MYCL and MYCN amplifications. Both treatment-naive and relapsed SCLC samples showed high prevalence of mutation-associated neoantigens (median= 86 in treatment-naive and 90 in relapsed SCLC; p=0.8) and TP53 was the most frequently altered gene to result in a neoantigen (48% of analyzed samples). Potential mechanisms of immune evasion, including amplification of CD24, overexpression of IDO1, increased M2 macrophage presence, and upregulation of HLA-E were also observed in relapse samples. Differences in alternative splicing patterns were observed between treatment-naive and relapsed small cell samples. Retained intron events were significantly enriched in treatment-naive samples and affected genes involved in DNA repair, metabolism, and WNT and MYC pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the genomic and transcriptomic features of relapsed SCLC. These samples were characterized by genomic instability, WNT and MYC dysregulation, and splicing aberrations. Additional studies targeting the splicing machinery, WNT signaling, and immune evasion pathways could identify novel therapeutic vulnerabilities in SCLC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Siddhartha Devarakonda, My Hoang, Sumithra Sankararaman, Zach L Skidmore, Brett H Herzog, Kymberlie Pepin, Joshua McMichael, Jeffrey P Ward, Daniel Morgensztern, Saiama Naheed Waqar, Angela Brinker, Trudy G Oliver, Malachi Griffith, Obi L Griffith, Ramaswamy Govindan. 2026-09-16. Genomic and transcriptomic features of relapsed small cell lung cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2026.104201

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article