PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42749051

Integrated multi-omic profiling enables recurrence risk stratification beyond pathological stage in resected EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early-stage EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) demonstrates heterogeneous outcomes after curative surgery, yet adjuvant treatment decisions are guided by pathological stage alone. Following the ADAURA trial, adjuvant osimertinib is the standard of care for resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant LUAD; however, real-world data demonstrate that up to 40% of patients remain disease-free at five years without adjuvant osimertinib, underscoring the need for improved risk stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed integrated clinical, genomic and transcriptomic profiling of 400 patients with resected stage IA-IIIA EGFR-mutant LUAD. EGFR-mutant recurrence risk models integrating clinical, genomic and transcriptomic data were developed and validated across one internal and three external cohorts. RESULTS: Genomic instability, including TP53 co-mutations, copy number alterations and APOBEC-associated mutational signatures, increased with pathological stage. RBM10 co-mutations were enriched in tumours with L858R mutations and correlated with upregulation of WNT signalling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Transcriptomic features outperformed clinical or genomic variables alone in predicting recurrence risk, and a multi-omic model demonstrated superior and reproducible performance, achieving a median concordance index of 75.4% across four independent validation cohorts. The multi-omic model stratified recurrence risk within individual pathological stages, including stage I disease, and identified patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant EGFR TKI. CONCLUSIONS: These findings define the molecular heterogeneity of early-stage EGFR-mutant LUAD and support multi-omic risk stratification to inform adjuvant EGFR TKI decisions beyond pathological stage. Prospective validation in larger cohorts will be required to confirm these findings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephanie P L Saw, Mengyuan Pang, Jia Chi Yeo, Jacob J S Alvarez, Ngak Leng Sim, Amanda Y Guo, Sinem Kadioglu, Eunice L Y Lau, Yi Ting Lau, Denis Odinokov, Victor Getty, Gillianne G Y Lai, Darren W T Lim, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Mei-Kim Ang, Quan Sing Ng, Wan Ling Tan, Wei Chong Tan, Aaron C Tan, Sophia Y N Wong, Amanda O L Seet, Regina Hoo, Boon-Hean Ong, Tony K H Lim, Anders Jacobsen Skanderup, Daniel S W Tan. 2026-09-16. Integrated multi-omic profiling enables recurrence risk stratification beyond pathological stage in resected EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2026.104204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article