PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 43682

Premedication for elective Caesarean section.

Abstract

Four coded, but otherwise unidentified, premedicants were prescribed in randomised order for 219 patients who were to undergo elective Caesarean section. Seventy-six (35%) of these patients affirmed at the pre-operative visit that they were not anxious. Diazepam 5 mg and lorazepam 1 mg appeared to be superior to the placebo and to 10-6 ml of 90% alcohol in inducing calmness and/or drowsiness, although the differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of awareness or unpleasant dreams was considerably higher in the placebo and alcohol series (6.2% and 7.5%) than in the diazepam and lorazepam series (nil and 2.1%). There was no remarkable difference in the condition of the immediate newly-born related to the premedicant received by the mother, any small differences being much less impressive than that related to the duration of the U-D interval. No notable differences were observed in the long term conditions between the infants in the placebo, alcohol and diazepam series but the incidence of "reluctance to feed". If relief from preoperative anxiety-and possibly a reduction in the likelihood of awareness-without undue effect upon the infant is considered desirable, diazepam 5 mg is the preferred choice from the four drugs investigated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J S Crawford. 1979. Premedication for elective Caesarean section.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb08542.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Regional anesthesia in emergency cesarean section. Quality of epidural and spinal anesthesia].

From 1987 to 1989, 97.8% of non-elective caesarean sections at Innherred general hospital were performed under regional anaesthesia (N = 271). A retrospective analysis showed that the mean time from giving the anaesthetic until start of surgery was 28.1 min. with epidural anaesthesia and 12.7 min. with spinal anaesthesia. Mean time was 25.9 and 9.3 min. respectively in cases of suspected asphyxia. In eight women primary anesthesia was unsuccessful; six received further spinal anaesthesia and two general anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia is considered safe for the purpose, but in cases of serious asphyxia there is some controversy as to whether spinal or general anaesthesia is to be preferred.

Anesthesia, Epidural