PubMed · 4408418
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E H Engelhardt, J Boter, B Van Eijnsbergen, G Koning. 1974-09-21. [A comparative study of defibrillators].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4408418/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We describe the case of a 59-year-old gentleman with severe dilated cardiomyopathy requiring implantation of a dual-chamber biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). High defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were encountered at implant with an inadequate defibrillation safety margin. Testing of all possible shock vectors/polarities with and without the SVC coil and optimization of the distal RV coil position all proved inadequate. A satisfactory defibrillation safety margin was achieved following placement of a second lead in the coronary sinus to enable biventricular defibrillation. This case highlights an additional strategy for combating high DFTs and is an option even in dual-chamber biventricular ICD systems.