PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 440902

The right not to read.

Abstract

Skill in reading is desirable. However, the importance of reading may be overemphasized in schools. Reading skills are determined relatively and not absolutely. Thus, relatively poor readers will persist. Schools cannot eradicate individual differences. Biological makeup and societal pressures are the important factors in determining reading skill. Present methods of reading remediation are of questionable efficacy and are traumatic to some children. Time with its associated normal development succeeds in remediating the majority of children with dyslexia. Most poor readers eventually attain reading levels that enable them to comprehend the types of printed materials commonly encountered. If a child finds reading difficult or distasteful, that child should be encouraged to read but should have the right not to be forced to read.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Snyder. 1979. The right not to read.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/440902/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cognitive effects of mild head injury in children and adolescents.

A comprehensive review of recent neuropsychological studies of mild head injury (MHI) involving children and adolescents is presented. The seminal work of Rutter and his colleagues is reviewed. An alternative conceptualization of MHI as proposed by various researchers is elaborated and further research investigating the cognitive sequelae of MHI is reviewed. MHI is discussed within the context of development and information processing models. Finally, the sequelae of MHI are reviewed with respect to academic functioning. Methodological problems inherent in studies of MHI are identified and discussed. The studies reviewed here support the conclusion that both the cognitive and emotional consequences of MHI should receive serious evaluation.

Achievement

Fluent aphasia in children: definition and natural history.

We compared the course of a preschool child we followed for 4 years with published reports of 24 children with fluent aphasia. Our patient spoke fluently within 3 weeks of the injury. She was severely anomic and made many semantic paraphasic errors. Unlike other children with fluent aphasia, her prosody of speech was impaired initially, and her spontaneous language was dominated by stock phrases. Residual deficits include chronic impairment of auditory comprehension, repetition, and word retrieval. She has more disfluencies in spontaneous speech 4 years after her head injury than acutely. School achievement in reading and mathematics remains below age level. Attention to the timing of recovery of fluent speech and to the characteristics of receptive and expressive language over time will permit more accurate description of fluent aphasia in childhood.

Achievement

Developmental manual dyspraxia: a lesson in mind and brain.

For decades, pediatricians assiduously documented "soft neurologic signs" in children referred for school learning difficulties, although pediatric neurologists, including Charles F. Barlow, pointed out the dissociation between most neuropsychological abnormalities and the motor findings in question. Later, large epidemiologic studies confirmed the independence of soft signs from other neuropsychological defects. We used a standardized dyspraxia battery to study 164 schoolchildren 5 to 12 years old. We found that in the group as a whole there was a positive correlation between motor performance in the dyspraxia battery and IQ on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--revised (Full-Scale, Verbal, and Performance). In terms of dyspraxia subscales, we found that Performance IQ and Full-Scale IQ correlated with imitation of nonsense gestures and use of actual objects, whereas Verbal IQ correlated positively only with pantomime on command. In contrast, for the group of 24 subjects whose scores on the battery designated them as dyspraxic, there was no correlation between dyspraxia scores and IQ. Together with the existence of specific, dramatically different, types of dyspraxia among the 24 dyspraxic subjects, present findings uphold the earlier neurologic opinion that "motor soft signs" are not evidence for fixed "brain damage" or even for other types of motor dysfunction, and that dissociation of different specific cognitive dysfunctions is the rule within individual patients.

Achievement