PubMed · 4412034
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B Calesnick. 1974. Anorectics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4412034/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The contribution of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the induction of locomotor sensitization by amphetamine (AMPH) was investigated. Rats pre-exposed to AMPH in the VTA showed significantly higher locomotor activity when subsequently tested with a systemic AMPH challenge than rats preexposed to VTA saline. Rats pre-exposed to AMPH but co-injected with the selective mGluR antagonist (RS)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine [(RS)-MCPG] did not show this effect. These findings indicate that activation of mGluRs in the VTA is necessary for the induction of locomotor sensitization by AMPH and provide further support for the important role played by excitatory amino acids in this site in the development of sensitization to AMPH.
Several studies indicate that blockade of stress-induced corticosterone secretion prevents the development of stress-induced sensitization to the behavioral effects of stimulants. The present study examined whether chronic blockade of corticosterone synthesis with metyrapone could reverse stress-induced amphetamine sensitization in rats. Restraint stress in cylindrical chambers, 2 times 30 min/day for 5 days over an 8-day schedule, was used as the stressor. Following completion of the stress protocol, animals were cannulated with microdialysis guide cannulae over the nucleus accumbens, and then treated with either metyrapone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (1 ml/kg) for 7 days. On the seventh day, animals were implanted with microdialysis probes in the nucleus accumbens, and on the following day, all animals were tested for their locomotor, stereotypy, and nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC release responses to an injection of saline followed 60 min later by d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Neither stress or metyrapone treatment had an effect on the behavioral or dopamine release response to saline. However, amphetamine-stimulated locomotion and stereotypy were strongly enhanced, while amphetamine-stimulated dopamine release response was slightly enhanced (significant only by drug x time interaction), in stressed animals. Metyrapone treatment reduced the stress-induced increase in the locomotor, but not stereotypy, response to amphetamine. In contrast, the dopamine release response to amphetamine was enhanced in metyrapone-treated animals, in both stressed and non-stressed groups, while DOPAC levels were unaffected by treatment group. This augmentation was particularly evident in the stressed-metyrapone-treated animals. Furthermore, non-stressed animals showed an increased locomotor and stereotypy response to amphetamine after treatment with metyrapone. These findings indicate that metyrapone treatment can reverse, or inhibit the expression of, stress-induced sensitization to the behavioral effects of amphetamine. However, the ability of metyrapone treatment to enhance the behavioral (in non-stressed animals) and dopamine release (in non-stressed and stressed animals) responses to amphetamine indicate that chronic metyrapone treatment will produce stimulant sensitization when given alone.
We examined the neuronal targets in the rat brain for the novel wakefulness-promoting agent modafinil and for amphetamine using c-Fos immunohistochemistry. Both modafinil and amphetamine induced neuronal expression of c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, anterior hypothalamus and central nucleus of the amygdala. Modafinil also increased c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, while amphetamine had no effect. Brain regions in which amphetamine increased c-Fos-like immunoreactivity, but modafinil had no effect, included frontal cortex, striatum, lateral habenula, supraoptic nucleus and basolateral nucleus of the amygdala. These findings suggest that the mechanism of action of modafinil is different from that of amphetamine and that the neuronal targets for modafinil in the brain include nuclei of the hypothalamus and amygdala.