PubMed · 4487239
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S I Gnetova. 1973. [The BMR].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4487239/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) affects resting energy expenditure (REE) as well as body composition, lipid profile, and serum leptin in obese patients. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A total of 108 obese patients with SH defined as normal free thyroxine levels and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values of > 4.38 microU/ml (mean +/- 2 SD of the values of our reference group of obese patients with normal thyroid function) were compared with a group of 131 obese patients matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) but with normal TSH levels. We assessed estimated daily caloric intake by 7-day recall, REE by indirect calorimetry, body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis, serum leptin by radioimmunoassay, and lipid profile (i.e., total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides). RESULTS: All of the variables measured were not different between the euthyroid obese patients and those with SH. In a multiple regression model with REE expressed for kilograms of fat free mass (REE/kgFFM) as a dependent variable and percentage of fat mass, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, age, TSH, free thyroxine, serum leptin, and caloric intake as independent variables, only percentage of fat mass was significantly correlated with REE/kgFFM in both groups. In the SH group only, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, age, and TSH were related to REE/kgFFM and explained 69.5% of its variability. After dividing the patients with SH using a cutoff TSH value of 5.7 microU/ml, which represents 3 SD above the mean of TSH levels of the group of obese patients with normal thyroid function, only REE/kgFFM was significantly different and lower in the group of more severely hypothyroid patients. DISCUSSION: In patients with obesity, SH affects energy expenditure only when TSH is clearly above the normal range; it does not change body composition and lipid profile. We suggest that, at least in obese patients, evaluation of TSH levels may be useful to rule out a possible impairment of resting energy expenditure due to a reduced peripheral effect of thyroid hormones.
OBJECTIVE: Restrained eating is a common dietary practice among individuals who are attempting to prevent weight gain, but little is known about differences in energy physiology and regulation between restrained and unrestrained eaters. We investigated this issue in non-obese free-living postmenopausal women classified as long-term restrained (n=26) or unrestrained (n=34) eaters group matched for body mass index (BMI). MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were made of total energy expenditure (TEE), resting energy expenditure (REE), body composition, reported leisure time activity, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) and weight change during the study period. In addition, physical activity level (PAL) and nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) were calculated from measured variables. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in body composition, weight change, aerobic capacity or total leisure time activity. Relationships between fat-free mass (FFM) and both REE and TEE, and the relationship between work load and energy expenditure in the test of maximal oxygen consumption, were also not different between groups. However, restrained eaters had a significantly lower PAL (equal to TEE/REE, 1.72+/-0.04 vs 1.84+/-0.04, P<0.05). In addition, in multiple regression models predicting NEAT, NEAT was significantly lower in restrained eaters than unrestrained eaters and there was a positive relationship between NEAT and weight change in unrestrained eaters but no relationship in restrained eaters (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to a previous report, we found no significant difference in TEE between restrained and unrestrained eaters. PAL was slightly lower in restrained eaters, apparently due to reduced NEAT, and restrained eaters also lacked the positive association between NEAT and body weight change seen in unrestrained eaters. This latter finding, if confirmed in future studies, could help explain an increased susceptibility of restrained eaters to weight gain. SPONSORSHIP: NIH grants AG12829, DK46124 and T32AG00209, and US Cooperative Agreement number 58-1950-9-001.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate issues related to under-reporting in dietary surveys relevant for development of food-based dietary guidelines. SETTING: Food and nutrient intakes in two national dietary surveys are analysed in relation to under-reporting using the concept of cut-off values for the ratio between energy intake and basal metabolic rate as well as biochemical markers of nutritional status. RESULTS: Subjects with an implausibly low EI/BMR ratio had dietary patterns more close to recommended levels, e.g. lower fat intake and higher fibre intake, than those with acceptable energy intakes. Intakes of micronutrients were lower. This was due to both general and selective under-reporting of foods. Under-reporting was due to less frequent consumption, larger proportion of non-consumers and smaller portion sizes. Low EI/BMR ratios did not influence the characterisation of protein and micronutrient intake of low and high consumers of fruit and vegetable intake. CONCLUSIONS: Under-reporting can influence the usefulness of dietary data as a tool for developing food-based dietary guidelines, and the extent of under-reporting should be assessed using appropriate methods.