PubMed · 4494884
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E E Hilger. 1974. Developing nursing outcome criteria.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4494884/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia following formation of an ileostomy or colostomy is common. This article reviews the incidence of hernia, the technical factors related to the construction of the stoma that may influence the incidence, and the success of the different methods of repair. METHODS: A literature search using the Medline database was performed to locate English language articles on parastomal hernia. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed. RESULTS: Parastomal hernia affects 1.8-28.3 per cent of end ileostomies, and 0-6.2 per cent of loop ileostomies. Following colostomy formation, the rates are 4.0-48.1 and 0-30.8 per cent respectively. Site of stoma formation (through or lateral to rectus abdominis), trephine size, fascial fixation and closure of lateral space are not proven to affect the incidence of hernia. The role of extraperitoneal stoma construction is uncertain. Mesh repair gives a lower rate of recurrence (0-33.3 per cent) than direct tissue repair (46-100 per cent) or stoma relocation (0-76.2 per cent). CONCLUSION: The incidence of parastomal hernia is between 0 and 48.1 per cent, depending on the type of stoma and length of follow-up. No technical factors related to the construction of the stoma have been shown to prevent herniation. If repair is required, a prosthetic mesh technique should be considered. Further randomized clinical trials (particularly of extraperitoneal stoma construction) are needed.
OBJECTIVES: To present our experience in the management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: All patients underwent bowel preparation and received perioperative antibiotics. If rectal injury was suspected, digital rectal examination was performed, aided by bubbling air into the rectum if required. When the diagnosis was confirmed, the hole was closed in two layers of absorbable sutures. A fat flap was developed from the omentum (in the transperitoneal approach) or the perirectal fat (in the extraperitoneal approach) and placed on the suture line. Anal dilation was performed. After surgery, broad-spectrum antibiotics and a low-residue diet were prescribed. RESULTS: Of 300 patients who underwent surgery between May 1998 and June 2002, 6 (2%) had a rectal injury. The first patient had received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Five cases were in the transperitoneal approach and were closed using omental fat and 1 was in the extraperitoneal approach with a perirectal fat flap. The first patient presented with a rectourethral fistula and was treated with catheterization for 1 month and a diverting colostomy. The others were detected intraoperatively and were treated laparoscopically. In the second patient, a diverting colostomy was performed at the end of surgery using a separate incision. Patients resumed oral intake within 2 to 7 days and were discharged from the hospital between 6 and 18 days postoperatively. No wound infection was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can be identified and managed intraoperatively without requiring conversion. Double-layered closure reinforced by a fat flap resulted in an uneventful recovery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.