PubMed · 4510258
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W Soltanoff. 1973. Apical sealing procedures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4510258/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence on the most appropriate management of failed endodontic treatment. DATA SOURCES: Appropriate articles were selected from the international literature. RESULTS: There was good evidence that conventional endodontic treatment is associated with a successful outcome in a significant proportion of cases. The results of surgical treatment are more difficult to interpret since account should be made of the status of the existing root filling. However, there is evidence of an increased success rate with a satisfactory orthograde root filling. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to make direct comparisons from cited studies to advance a clear argument in support of one treatment modality. However, it is judged that a conventional endodontic retreatment approach is the most appropriate in the first instance, providing access to the root canal is possible. This does not preclude a subsequent surgical approach. Teeth that are permanently restored soon after retreatment are more successful than those which are not. There are significant challenges in setting up prospective research studies to directly address the problem of the failed root filing.
Recently, an Er:YAG laser has attracted attention because of the possibility of cutting hard tissues with extremely small thermal effects. In this article, we report 8 cases (13 teeth) of apicoectomy using Er:YAG laser. All procedures were performed without using an air turbine or an electric drill. Although the cutting speed of this laser was slightly slower than ordinary methods, its clinical application for apicoectomy has many advantages including absence of discomfort and vibration, less chance for contamination of the surgical site, and reduced risk of trauma to adjacent tissue.
The in vitro sealing ability of the root-canal sealer Diaket when used as a root-end filling material was compared with that of amalgam using linear micro-leakage of Indian ink. Eight groups of 20 extracted teeth each were formed, plus 12 control teeth as follows: 1) root-end resection of 45 degrees bevel, root-end cavity preparation with an 008 round bur, amalgam root-end filling; 2) 45 degrees bevel, bur, Diaket; 3) 45 degrees bevel, using a sonic retro-prep tip, amalgam; 4) 45 degrees bevel, sonic, Diaket; 5) no bevel, bur, amalgam; 6) no bevel, bur, Diaket; 7) no bevel, sonic, amalgam; 8) no bevel, sonic, Diaket. Root-end cavity depths of 3 mm were prepared. Specimens were immersed in Indian ink for 2 weeks. The teeth were demineralized, rendered transparent and linear dye penetration recorded. Results showed that Diaket provided a superior seal to amalgam irrespective of the root-end preparation. The degree of bevel of the resected root-end did not influence leakage. Sonic instrumentation resulted in a larger root-end cavity than with burs.