PubMed · 4515404
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J R Garcia, A E Badoyan. [Tooth section--endodontic-prosthetic therapy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4515404/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This article describes a procedure for making a crown that combines an all-porcelain facial veneer with a metal lingual and occluding surface. The procedure combines both the conventional lost wax technique and the use of a refractory cast for firing porcelain. The crown retains the advantages of the traditional all-porcelain crown restoration but reduces the risk of damage to the opposing teeth associated with an all-ceramic occluding surface. Furthermore, compared with porcelain, the metal surface allows more control over the occlusal and lingual contours during construction of the crown. Although the construction of the anterior crown is described, the procedure is equally applicable to posterior full-coverage restorations.
Post-retained restorations are a practical and dependable treatment option for restoring teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure. Manufactured post patterns combined with an effective clinical procedure will provide a simple, reliable, and economic method to produce restorations with a cast tapered post. The cast tapered post can be used for all clinical applications in which a post-retained restoration is indicated.
A previous study indicated a mean marginal discrepancy of 169 microns (SD = 23) for cemented CeraOne ceramic crowns. Since then, the components have been redesigned by the manufacturer. This study assessed the marginal discrepancy of the new components by use of a video camera and stereomicroscope connected to a computer. Fifteen samples each of (a) ceramic caps (control), (b) ceramic caps fired once in a porcelain oven (c) ceramic crowns, and (d) cemented (zinc phosphate) ceramic crowns were examined. The results indicated that the mean marginal discrepancies were: caps 20.4 microns (SD = 10.8), fired caps 18.3 microns (SD = 9.3), crowns 28.1 microns (SD = 9.7), and cemented crowns 65.9 microns (SD = 15.8). Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed significant differences between these mean marginal discrepancies (p < 0.0001). A Scheffe F-test revealed no statistically significant difference between the means for caps, fired caps, and crowns, whereas cemented crowns had significantly greater mean marginal discrepancies compared with all uncemented retainers (p < 0.0001). The mean marginal discrepancy of the redesigned CeraOne ceramic system (cemented crowns) was reduced by more than 100 microns compared with the original design.