PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 456036

Malpractice--in dermatology.

Abstract

Among twenty-three types of physicians, dermatologists rate sixth lowest in malpractice risk. With dermatology, the risk of a suit is general; no one doctor or type of dermatologic practice has been shown to bear unusual risk--everyone is susceptible. However, dermatologist who give x-ray therapy or limit their work to cosmetic procedures rate higher. Patients sue because of facial burns or scars, negligent diagnosis, drug reaction, falls in the office, wart removal, and treatment that exceeds the patient's desire at the moment. Care must be exercised in the use of problem drugs such as antineoplastic agents, corticosteroids, oral contraceptives, sulfones, vitamin A acid, liquid nitrogen, cantharidin, podophyllin, and fluorescent dyes. Dermatologists are urged to obtain consultation for the benefit of patient and doctor, to maintain good relations with fellow physicians, and to avoid inappropriate criticism of other physicians. Lengthy lists of "do's" and "don'ts" in patient care are included, and some possible changes in the malpractice situation are listed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Binder. 1979. Malpractice--in dermatology.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/456036/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Coding-complete genome sequence of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 13 from grapevine in California.

In this study, we report the coding-complete genome sequence of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 13 (GLRaV-13), isolate CA8881, detected in Vitis vinifera in California, USA. The genome sequence exhibited over 95% nucleotide identity with previously reported GLRaV-13 isolates and contributed to better understanding of the genetic diversity of ampeloviruses infecting grapevine.

California

Parenteral nutrition: first decade, trends.

Parenteral feeding has saved lives and enhanced therapy of patients who cannot eat. Future trends of this technique for patients, physicians, hospitals are discussed.

California