PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 45679

Assessing the validity of EMS data.

Abstract

Variation in the assessment of basic clinical data gathered by emergency medical technicians and emergency department nurses was studied. Prior to testing, precise definitions, categories and procedures were developed and tolerance limits for the quantitative variables were created. Each participant evaluated four consecutive patients simultaneously with another evaluator setting the standard. The results indicate that the error rate is low to moderate for the different variables. For the quantitative variables, the error rate is over 20% and, when an error does occur, it is often very large. This indicates a need for ongoing emphasis on accurate measurement and, in cases where highly accurate data is essential, the use of multiple observers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C G Cayten, N Herrmann, L W Cole, S Walsh. 1978. Assessing the validity of EMS data.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-1124(78)80159-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nutrition support teams--alive, well, and still growing. Results of a 1991 A.S.P.E.N. survey.

This report summarizes data collected from 1680 hospitals that responded to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Nutrition Support Team Survey. The survey was conducted primarily to determine the prevalence, composition, and funding of existing and planned Nutrition Support Teams. Results tend to verify the importance of the Nutrition Support Team within the hospital's organizational structure. In addition, A.S.P.E.N. hoped to develop a national directory of Nutrition Support Teams as a byproduct of the survey. Details about the Nutrition Support Team Directory appear at the conclusion of this report.

Data Collection