PubMed1997
Despite progress realised in transplantation and organ procurement, there is an increasing gap between the number of patients on the national waiting list and the number of harvested organs. As a result, the appropriate organs must be matched with the appropriate patient, with two constraints: equity and efficacy. In a context of lack of organs, another public health problematic is to conciliate both the interests of a given patient and the interests of those on the waiting lists. In 1996, the French secretary of state for health instituted a public consultation committee chaired by the vice-president of the Comité consultatif national d'éthique, Counsellor Jean Michaud, to study organ allocation rules and to plan recommendations for the future. Using, as a starting point, the allocation rules initiated in the past by France Transplant and transiently applied by l'Etablissement français des Greffes, the committee conducted a large audition of health care professionals concerned with transplantation, individuals qualified in ethics, laws, sociology or ethnology, politicians and a sample representation of the population. A new corpus of allocation rules and procedures was then defined according to the committee recommendations and the advice of all medico-surgical transplantation teams, and published as a ministerial order in the Journal officiel de la République française in november 1996. It specifies shared principles and organ by organ specific allocation rules.