PubMed · 4740583
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B S Brown. A step forward.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01537550
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that major affective and/or anxiety disorders are increased among relatives of autistic probands compared with controls. Among 36 families with an autistic child, 23 (64%) have a first degree relative diagnosed with major depressive disorder and 14 (39%) have a first degree relative diagnosed with social phobia. These rates are significantly greater than the 19% and 5%, respectively, found among 21 families with a child having a genetic condition, tuberous sclerosis complex, or a seizure disorder but no autism. The frequency of major depression among the 96 first degree relatives of autistic probands is 37.5% compared with 11.1% found among 45 relatives of control probands. The frequency of social phobia, 20.2%, is approximately 10 times more common than that found among the relatives of the control probands (2.4%). Elevated rates of both major depression and social phobia are found among parents and siblings in the families with an autistic child. Furthermore, 64% of parents affected with a major depression had the onset of the first depressive episode prior to the birth of the autistic child and all parents with social phobia had the onset of condition prior to the birth of the autistic child. Family patterns differ depending on the intellectual level of the autistic child; specifically, social phobia is significantly greater among the first degree relatives of non-retarded autistic probands than among relatives of individuals with autism and comorbid mental retardation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Used Pivotal Response Training (PRT) to teach 7 children with autism to engage in symbolic play behaviors. Symbolic play, complexity of play behavior, and creativity of play were assessed. In addition, generalization measures were obtained across settings, toys, and play partners. Interaction with the play partners and comparison with typical controls were also examined. Results indicated that children with autism rarely exhibited symbolic play before training or after a control condition. After specific symbolic play training using PRT, all of the children learned to perform complex and creative symbolic play actions at levels similar to that of language-matched typical controls. In most cases the children generalized their play to new toys, environments, and play partners and continued to engage in symbolic play behavior after a 3-month follow-up period. In addition, interaction skills improved after training. Treatment implications for these findings are discussed.